2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave assisted synthesis and electrochemical behaviour of LiMg0.1Co0.9O2 for lithium rechargeable batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the preferred site location of Mg changes with the U value. Mg is preferentially located on Co sites for calculations with GGA and GGA+U with U below 5.0 eV, which is in line with experiments 11,12,15,22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]81 showing that Mg is located at Co site. For calculations with U = 5.0 and 5.5 eV, however, Mg is equally stable on both Co and Li sites.…”
Section: B Defect Formation Energiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, the preferred site location of Mg changes with the U value. Mg is preferentially located on Co sites for calculations with GGA and GGA+U with U below 5.0 eV, which is in line with experiments 11,12,15,22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]81 showing that Mg is located at Co site. For calculations with U = 5.0 and 5.5 eV, however, Mg is equally stable on both Co and Li sites.…”
Section: B Defect Formation Energiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cu dopant improves the cycling stability of LiCoO 2 material and further as reported by Yan et al [38] microwave synthesis controls the lithium loss (4%) compared to conventional calcination process (20-30%). Microwave synthesis of LiCu 0.2 Co 0.8 O 1.9 exhibits better cycling performance, less capacity fade compared to convetional synthesis of LiCu 0.05 Co 0.95 O 2 and other elemental doping cycled up to 4.5 V [5][6][7]11,16,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. Hence, microwave synthesis without calcination improves the cycling stability of the synthesized materials compared to the material synthesized by calcination assisted microwave process [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave irradiation to transition metal oxides usually results in faster heating of the compounds so that the desired final product can be obtained within very short time [18]. Recently, we have reported the synthesis of Mg doped LiCoO 2 [5] material irradiated by 50% microwave power followed by calcination at 850 • C. It is observed that 50% microwave power is not enough to obtain the required final product. Hence, in this paper, we report the synthesis of divalent substituted Cu 2+ into the Co site in LiCoO 2 cathode material using microwave method only without further calcinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, many novel methods such as the sol-gel method (SG) [5], hydrothermal method (HT) [6], one-step method (OS) [7], rheological phase reaction method (RPR) [8], low temperature solid-state reaction method (LTSSR) [9], and microwave processing method (MWP) [10][11] have been explored to improve the electrochemical performance of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 cathode materials. Among these new methods the MWP method has some unique characteristics such as rapid and uniform heating, short reaction time, and low energy consumption compared with the conventional heating methods, and has been used in the synthesis of cathode materials of lithium ion batteries as an ideal heat source [12][13][14][15][16]. Rare earth elements have some outstanding features such as high electric charge, large radius and high self-polarization ability, and have been widely applied in the synthesis of cathode materials of lithium ion batteries, for instance, LiCo 1−x Re x O 2 , LiNi 1−x Re x O 2 , LiMn 2−x Re x O 4 , Li 2 V 2−x Re x O 5 , and LiFe 1−x Re x PO 4 (Re represents rare earths) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%