2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave pyrolysis of rice straw to produce biochar as an adsorbent for CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm the effect of the effectiveness of specific surface area on methane enrichment compared to zeolite, SAA analysis is also required. In addition, biochar is not sensitive to water vapor [18] compared with natural zeolite so in this study was indicated that the absence of capturing competition between water vapor and carbon dioxide on biochar. Xu, et al [25] also reported that biochar derived from livestock manure are rich in minerals which can facilitate carbon dioxide capture.…”
Section: Biogas Purificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To confirm the effect of the effectiveness of specific surface area on methane enrichment compared to zeolite, SAA analysis is also required. In addition, biochar is not sensitive to water vapor [18] compared with natural zeolite so in this study was indicated that the absence of capturing competition between water vapor and carbon dioxide on biochar. Xu, et al [25] also reported that biochar derived from livestock manure are rich in minerals which can facilitate carbon dioxide capture.…”
Section: Biogas Purificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Even it presented some similarities of typical bands. The bands between 3440-3457 cm -1 confirmed vibration of O-H stretching of phenol, alcohol, and carboxylic acid on the surface of biochar [17][18]. The vibration of C=C aromatic stretching was identified at 1400-1500 cm -1 .…”
Section: Fig 1 N 2 Adsorption-desorption Isotherm On Natural Zeolitementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several attempts have been made to increase the value of sugarcane bagasse through conversion to biochar by pyrolysis (Hugo, 2010;Jeong et al, 2016). Sugarcane bagasse biochar (SCBB) was produced under various pyrolysis conditions (Ding et al, 2014;Cha et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2015;Li et al, 2016) including temperature (ranged from 250 to <900 C) which affects its porosity and specific surface area (SSA), heating facilities (traditional kilns, muffle furnace, or microwave oven), reaction time (ranged from 20 min to 8 h) and atmosphere (oxygen-limited, vacuum or N 2 -saturated atmosphere). Sugarcane bagasse was used either in its raw state (Hugo, 2010;Ding et al, 2014;Jeong et al, 2016), anaerobically digested (Inyang et al, 2010), or subjected to different physical or chemical treatments to enhance its sorption capacity and/or selectivity (Hafshejani et al, 2016;Noraini et al, 2016;Schwantes et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to achieve continuous production due to the complex preparation process, and a high temperature leads to a longer production time. One alternative is to find new methods with both an environmental and continuous simplified process to produce carbons (Huang et al 2015). Porous carbon from tomato waste (TWNC) was obtained by activating the tomato waste (TW) with salt (ZnCl2) (TW/ZnCl2 weight ratio of 1:1), followed by pyrolysis of the impregnated sample at 500 °C for 1 h under a nitrogen atmosphere of 99.99% and a flow rate of 100 mL/min (Güzel et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%