2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2020.102323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-air motion planning of robot using heat flow method with state constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for constraint (16b) we have h = h c −f terr (p x , p y ) ≤ 0. We modify slightly the method in [6] to encode the activation/deactivation of the state constraints in different phases. To this end, denote by h j (x), j ∈ Z + ≤ k c , the j-th scalar constraint function with k c the number of such constraints.…”
Section: Fixed Contact Foot Position Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, for constraint (16b) we have h = h c −f terr (p x , p y ) ≤ 0. We modify slightly the method in [6] to encode the activation/deactivation of the state constraints in different phases. To this end, denote by h j (x), j ∈ Z + ≤ k c , the j-th scalar constraint function with k c the number of such constraints.…”
Section: Fixed Contact Foot Position Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, whereas PDEs such the HJB scale exponentially in the dimension of the system, the AGHF scales polynomially. However in our implementation, choice of larger λ, α, β can result in longer solving time, since the pdepe function determines the integration step size ∆s automatically without option to customize [6]. For example, with large value of λ, the magnitude of dx(•,s) ds is generally large, as a result, the solver uses smaller ∆s, increasing the solving time.…”
Section: Two Leg Hopping On Uneven Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations