Mid- to long-term function and implant survival of ACL reconstruction and medial Oxford UKR

Kennedy, James A.; Molloy, James; Mohammad, Hasan R; Mellon, Stephen; Dodd, Christopher; Murray, David

doi:10.1016/j.knee.2019.05.009

Cited by 14 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the end of the selection process, seven papers were included in this systematic review ( Figure 1 ) and data extraction was performed. In the paper of Kennedy et al [ 17 ], a cohort of patients who underwent staged ACLR and UKA was included. We excluded data related to this subgroup, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Results of Simultaneous Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Albo

Campi

Zampogna

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical and functional outcomes and complication rate of simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). A systematic search in PubMed–Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify eligible randomized clinical trials, observational studies, or case series that reported on clinical and functional results of combined ACLR and UKA in adults with a unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and ACL deficiency. Four retrospective studies and three prospective studies were included in this review. A total of 169 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. The Mean Oxford Knee Score improved from 29.4 to 43.9 at the final follow-up. All the other reported scores significantly improved after surgery. The overall revision rate was 3.5%. The MINORS score ranged from 8 to 14. Association analysis of MINORS score and year of publication, through Pearson’s coefficient, showed no significant association (p = −0.089). Simultaneous ACLR and UKA is a safe procedure with a significant postoperative improvement of functional and clinical outcomes for patients with ACL injury that complain of knee instability and isolated medial compartment pain.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the seven included studies, two were prospective [ 17 , 18 ] and four were retrospective [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] of level of evidence (LOE) IV. One was a retrospective cohort study with comparison group of LOE III [ 23 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Results of Simultaneous Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Albo

Campi

Zampogna

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All were published between 2006 and 2019. The search resulted in one comparative case series (Level III) [19], four prospective cohort studies (Level III) [9,12,16,18] and four case series (Level IV) [11,13,17,20]. Average follow-up periods ranged from 2 years to 7.8 years in a longterm study.…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most studies used ipsilateral autologous hamstring autografts for ACL reconstruction [13,[16][17][18][19][20].…”

Section: Graft Choicementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined to partial knee replacement in active patients with ACL deficiency and knee osteoarthritis

Legnani

Muzzi

Peretti

et al. 2020

The Physician and Sportsmedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To report, through a systematic review of the literature, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) combined to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It was hypothesized that this combined technique is a safe and effective procedure providing satisfactory post-operative functional outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching Pubmed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase and Ovid. Only studies in English pertaining all levels of evidence reporting on subjects with medial osteoarthritis and ACL deficiency undergoing UKR combined to ACL reconstruction were considered. Review articles and expert opinion or editorial pieces were excluded. Outcomes of interest included indications, clinical assessment including activity level, associated procedures, rate of complications such as revision surgery Results: Overall, 9 studies met all the inclusion criteria for this review. All were published between 2006 and 2019. The search resulted in one comparative case series (Level III), four prospective cohort studies (Level III) and four case series (Level IV). From these studies, 249 patients were identified.Conclusions: The combination of UKR and ACL reconstruction appears a safe and effective procedure providing satisfying outcomes and limited complications in selected patients with medial OA and ACL insufficiency. Further comparative studies reporting long-term outcomes are needed, as high-level studies on this topic are lacking.

show abstract

Empfehlungen zur unikondylären Schlittenendoprothetik im Wandel der Zeit

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mid- to long-term function and implant survival of ACL reconstruction and medial Oxford UKR

Cited by 14 publications

References 46 publications

Results of Simultaneous Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Results of Simultaneous Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined to partial knee replacement in active patients with ACL deficiency and knee osteoarthritis

Empfehlungen zur unikondylären Schlittenendoprothetik im Wandel der Zeit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About