Abstract. An important driver of climate change is stratospheric water vapor (SWV), which in turn is influenced by the oxidation of atmospheric methane (CH 4 ). In order to parameterize the production of water vapor (H 2 O) from CH 4 oxidation, it is often assumed that the oxidation of one CH 4 molecule yields exactly two molecules of H 2 O. However, this assumption is based on an early study, which also gives evidence that this is not true at all altitudes.In the current study, we re-evaluate this assumption with a comprehensive systematic analysis using a stateof-the-art chemistry-climate model (CCM), namely the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model, and present three approaches to investigate the yield of H 2 O and hydrogen gas (H 2 ) from CH 4 oxidation. We thereby make use of the Module Efficiently Calculating the Chemistry of the Atmosphere (MECCA) in a box model and global model configuration. Furthermore, we use the kinetic chemistry tagging technique (MECCA-TAG) to investigate the chemical pathways between CH 4 , H 2 O and H 2 , by being able to distinguish hydrogen atoms produced by CH 4 from H 2 from other sources.We apply three approaches, which all agree that assuming a yield of 2 overestimates the production of H 2 O in the lower stratosphere (calculated as 1.5-1.7). Additionally, transport and subsequent photochemical processing of longer-lived intermediates (mostly H 2 ) raise the local yield values in the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere above 2 (maximum > 2.2). In the middle and upper mesosphere, the influence of loss and recycling of H 2 O increases, making it a crucial factor in the parameterization of the yield of H 2 O from CH 4 oxidation. An additional sensitivity study with the Chemistry As A Boxmodel Application (CAABA) shows a dependence of the yield on the hydroxyl radical (OH) abundance. No significant temperature dependence is found. We focus representatively on the tropical zone between 23 • S and 23 • N. It is found in the global approach that presented results are mostly valid for midlatitudes as well. During the polar night, the method is not applicable.Our conclusions question the use of a constant yield of H 2 O from CH 4 oxidation in climate modeling and encourage to apply comprehensive parameterizations that follow the vertical profiles of the H 2 O yield derived here and take the chemical H 2 O loss into account.