1994
DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092390413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle‐ear development VI: Structural maturation of the rat conducting apparatus

Abstract: Middle-ear growth was very orderly and systematic in the data reported. When maturation of the area ratio was considered against development of the endocochlear potential or the round window compound action potential, it was clear that the growth of this important aspect of the middle ear preceded the onset of cochlear function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[Bulla volume also increases significantly beyond 20 DAB and therefore may partly account for some of the data of Cohen et al 1993, which were obtained with a closed bulla, but this change should not have influenced other measurements of stapes vibrations, such as our own, obtained with the bulla widely opened.] In neonatal rats the improvement of middle-ear sensitivity (Doan et al, 1996) is also positively correlated with the growth in ossicular mass (the malleus and incus reach mature values of mass at 34 and 26 days) (Zimmer et al, 1994).…”
Section: G Interpretation Of the Development Of Middle-ear Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[Bulla volume also increases significantly beyond 20 DAB and therefore may partly account for some of the data of Cohen et al 1993, which were obtained with a closed bulla, but this change should not have influenced other measurements of stapes vibrations, such as our own, obtained with the bulla widely opened.] In neonatal rats the improvement of middle-ear sensitivity (Doan et al, 1996) is also positively correlated with the growth in ossicular mass (the malleus and incus reach mature values of mass at 34 and 26 days) (Zimmer et al, 1994).…”
Section: G Interpretation Of the Development Of Middle-ear Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The middle-ear anatomy of the rat is identical to that of the mouse, only larger [Fleischer, 1978;Saunders and Summers, 1982;Zimmer et al, 1994;Doan et al, 1996b]. Our experience with the malleus-incus joint in the rat indicated that it was tightly bound together (author's personal observation), like that seen in the mouse [Saunders and Garfinkle, 1983;Saunders and Crumling, 2001].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The line drawing in figure 1 B outlines the ossicles [Zimmer et al, 1994]. The rat is classified as a microtype middle ear [Fleischer, 1978] and has several unique attributes.…”
Section: Middle-ear Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 mm 2 [Donaldson et al, 1992], whereas in the rat it is only approx. 11 mm 2 [Zimmer et al, 1994]. The relative sizes of the pars tensa and pars flaccida are also quite different -while the human has a very small pars flaccida compared with the total size of the tympanic membrane, in rats the pars flaccida occupies between one quarter and one third of the tympanic membrane area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%