The Encyclopedia of Ancient History 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah15129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle Kingdom, Egypt

Abstract: The Middle Kingdom was regarded in later periods of Ancient Egypt as the classical age. Its literature and art works served as a model for the New Kingdom and Late Period. Its language was still used for the latest hieroglyphic inscriptions in the Roman Period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by the end of the Ptolemaic Period, use of these traditional grave goods had largely disappeared. Mummies were frequently decorated with masks, covered by panels of cartonnage or completely enclosed by cartonnage casing, and buried in traditional decorated coffins [ 35 ].…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by the end of the Ptolemaic Period, use of these traditional grave goods had largely disappeared. Mummies were frequently decorated with masks, covered by panels of cartonnage or completely enclosed by cartonnage casing, and buried in traditional decorated coffins [ 35 ].…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the question of death, funerary beliefs and burial practices related to the poor are more rarely tackled in these studies. In his book B urial Customs in Ancient Egypt: Life in death for rich and poor , Grajetzki (2003) has tried to present the various funerary practices and beliefs through all of ancient Egyptian history and across all of society. Despite the best efforts of the author, priority is given to the rich and very quickly takes precedence over discussions of the poor in his analysis.…”
Section: Poverty In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of the prenominal attributive adjective ‘multiple’ increases semantic confusion, above all in Egyptological literature, where there are no specific studies on the subject 3 (cf. Grajetzki 2007; Miniaci forthcoming a; Seidlmayer 1990, 398–430). The degree of variation between different types of burials is remarkable, yet the term ‘multiple burial’ is often used unconstrainedly, without further specification other than the mere numerical relationship: number of ‘individual(s) per structure’.…”
Section: Definition Of ‘Multiple’+‘burial’mentioning
confidence: 99%