2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: Factors affecting clinical success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
57
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with other studies (2,4,5,8,12,13,17,20), the results of this study showed that OMS length has no bearing on rate of failure (p=0.9113) and also, no difference was found indicating failure when the mandibular plane angle (4,9,11,16) was used to classify the three facial patterns (p=0.7522), which disagrees with studies that used other references and found differences between patients with different vertical characteristics (4,9,11,16). Corroborating Kim et al (11), and very close to the significance level, no significant differences were found in the different directions of force application deployed to achieve the desired type of movement (p=0.0584), although other studies have found a higher rate of failure in vertical forces vs. horizontal forces (4,8) and in forces used for tooth uprighting (9). Thus, the facial pattern and direction of force present unclear influence on the failure rate, and more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to address these features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with other studies (2,4,5,8,12,13,17,20), the results of this study showed that OMS length has no bearing on rate of failure (p=0.9113) and also, no difference was found indicating failure when the mandibular plane angle (4,9,11,16) was used to classify the three facial patterns (p=0.7522), which disagrees with studies that used other references and found differences between patients with different vertical characteristics (4,9,11,16). Corroborating Kim et al (11), and very close to the significance level, no significant differences were found in the different directions of force application deployed to achieve the desired type of movement (p=0.0584), although other studies have found a higher rate of failure in vertical forces vs. horizontal forces (4,8) and in forces used for tooth uprighting (9). Thus, the facial pattern and direction of force present unclear influence on the failure rate, and more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to address these features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An orthodontic force of less than 200 g (cN) (4,8,(13)(14)(15) was applied immediately after placement of each OMS (5,8,11,13,14) by means of elastomeric chains (3,8,11,15). Analgesics were prescribed for the day of OMS placement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the observed changes in bone density taking place with age may be related to the success rate of mini-implants. Kim et al [34] concluded that the patient's age is an influencing factor for success rates of midpalatal miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage. Additionally, Molly [12] stated that a reduced density of the jaw bone was correlated to a significantly higher failure rate of endosseous implants.…”
Section: Young T1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, as we know, there is for every surgical procedure, as is true for any endeavor, a learning curve of apprenticeship 4 .…”
Section: -2 -Particularities Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%