1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02733956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midterm results of renal artery stenting

Abstract: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has become the treatment of choice for major renal artery stenosis. Nonetheless, about 10% of renal artery stenoses cannot be properly dilated, and among the patients successfully dilated, 10%-15% had a recurrence. Renal artery stenting was used in 21 patients in cases of insufficient results after PTA: persisting significant stenosis after a primary or several PTAs (15 cases), recurrences (9 cases). Follow-up in all patients was from 12 months to 4 years. Implantati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies utilizing balloon expandable stents after inadequate results following percutaneous renal angioplasty for atherosclerotic renovascular disease, cure or improvement of hypertension has been reported in 64-100% of patients at a mean follow-up of 6-32.3 mo, and the restenosis rate has varied from 10-39% at a mean follow-up of 6.4-29 mo [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Our results following stent implantation for renal artery stenosis and resistant hypertension are comparable with these numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies utilizing balloon expandable stents after inadequate results following percutaneous renal angioplasty for atherosclerotic renovascular disease, cure or improvement of hypertension has been reported in 64-100% of patients at a mean follow-up of 6-32.3 mo, and the restenosis rate has varied from 10-39% at a mean follow-up of 6.4-29 mo [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Our results following stent implantation for renal artery stenosis and resistant hypertension are comparable with these numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results following stent implantation for renal artery stenosis and resistant hypertension are comparable with these numbers. Previous reports on renal artery stent implantation [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] have not addressed the effect of gender on outcomes. Our study shows no difference in the technical success rate, incidence of complications, acute, 6-mo, or long-term blood-pressure response, or incidence of restenosis between male and female patients undergoing stent place-ment for renal artery stenosis and refractory hypertension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[133][134][135] Case series of patients with atherosclerotic RAS report cure of HTN in less than 10% (range 0-19%) and improvement in 53% (range 42-63%). 6,106,110,113,115,116,118,[136][137][138][139][140] Results of surgical series are similar, albeit with higher complication rates and higher costs. 92,141,142 Multiple parameters (clinical, biochemical, radiological, anatomical) have been evaluated for their utility in predicting which patients are most likely to benefit from RAI in terms of blood pressure control.…”
Section: Renal Artery Revascularization and Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravascular stenting may improve results in ostial stenosis, and in fibromuscular lesions with a marked elastic component (5). Significant restenosis caused by neo-intimal lesions after stenting, however, remains a major challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%