2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midterm results of titanium conical Wagner stem with challenging femoral anatomy: Survivorship and unique bone remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rib height was 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 mm for sizes 13–15, 16–18, 19–22, and 23 and 24, respectively. With a cone angle of 5°, the distal stem diameter varied from 6.4 mm (size 13) to 17.4 mm (size 24) [ 20 ]. Therefore, the stem’s proximal to distal section diameter could be accurately calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rib height was 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 mm for sizes 13–15, 16–18, 19–22, and 23 and 24, respectively. With a cone angle of 5°, the distal stem diameter varied from 6.4 mm (size 13) to 17.4 mm (size 24) [ 20 ]. Therefore, the stem’s proximal to distal section diameter could be accurately calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of conical orthopedic devices is related to the need to increase implant resistance and provide greater stability for fixation, reducing complication rates [ 14 16 ]. The aim of this work is to evaluate the thermal behavior of an experimental conical drill, which presents a possible important mechanical potential, when compared to the conventional orthopedic cylindrical drill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%