Midwifery practice and the crisis of modernity: implications for the role of the midwife

Abstract

Publisher ElsevierItem record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4187 Publisher's statement þÿ T h i s i s t h e a u t h o r s v e r s i o n o f a w o r k t h a t w a s a c c e p t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n i n S o c i a l S c i e n c e &Midwifery practice and the crisis of modernity: implications for the role of the midwife AbstractAlmost since its inception, the concept of modernity was found to display tensions between its emancipatory potential to liberate the human subject from the manacles of tradition, and the application of reason to co-ordinate and control the natural world through scientific knowledge. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 12 midwives about their role in the Irish maternity services and argues that, in a period of late modernity, these tensions continue to manifest themselves in the context of the midwife's role. Although the contemporary period is marked by a loss of faith in scientific truths, widely contested obstetric knowledge and practices continue to exercise mastery over nature while undermining a central feature of the midwife's role-the liberation of the autonomous subject. Drawing on the theory of communicative action developed by the critical theorist Jurgen Habermas, it is argued that the midwife's role in facilitating the autonomous choices of women through communicative action is impeded by the colonization of the lifeworld of labour and childbirth by the technocratic system of obstetrics. Although participants reported that their role involved empowering women and facilitating choices through dialogue congruent with communicative action, data also suggested that participants used strategic communication with clients aimed at achieving particular ends. The use of strategic communication was linked to the way in which the midwife's role is determined to a large extent by the practices and protocols of obstetrics, and also to the notion of client passivity. The instrumental rationality of obstetrics is linked to an outcome orientation to power and money, and a political economy perspective of medicine. It appears that communicative action between midwives and obstetricians is important in bringing about structural changes to facilitate the conditions for communicative action between midwives and their clients. r

Midwives’ perception of the intrapartum risk of healthy nulliparae in spontaneous labour, in The Flanders, Belgium

“…Evidence suggests that good midwifery practice benefits women (Oakley et al 1995;de Veer &Meijer 1996;Fullerton et al 1996;Oakley et al 1996;Tucker et al 1996;Law &Lam 1999), but accepting that midwives should be encouraged to practise to the full extent of their professional role is not always easy (Blais et al 1994;Cheyne et al 1995;de Veer &Meijer 1996;Fullerton et al 1996;Gau et al 2002;Hyde &Roche-Reid 2004). The evidence from the study suggests that it is imperative for midwives to utilise the European legislation to ensure that Belgium, a member state of the European Union, implements to the full Directive 80/155/EEC on the activities of the midwife.…”

Predictors of Mode of Childbirth Based on Medicalized Maternal Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…On the other hand, when obstetric procedures are used in low-risk pregnancy and delivery, the role of midwives will change (22), and following this, the perception of the skills of midwives will change. As a result, 6 Iran Red Crescent Med J.…”

Can maternity care move beyond risk? Implications for midwifery as a profession

“…Adding to diminishing midwifery efficacy is the diminishing of normal birth itself, as the current climate of care narrowly focusses on medical outcomes, disregarding the larger picture (Hyde and Roche-Reid, 2004). This is resulting in a de-emphasis on midwifery skills and holistic care (Keating and Fleming, 2009), considered a cornerstone of midwifery philosophy (Nursing and midwifery Board of Ireland, 2015).…”