2011
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration by soaring or flapping: numerical atmospheric simulations reveal that turbulence kinetic energy dictates bee-eater flight mode

Abstract: Aerial migrants commonly face atmospheric dynamics that may affect their movement and behaviour. Specifically, bird flight mode has been suggested to depend on convective updraught availability and tailwind assistance. However, this has not been tested thus far since both bird tracks and meteorological conditions are difficult to measure in detail throughout extended migratory flyways. Here, we applied, to our knowledge, the first comprehensive numerical atmospheric simulations by mean of the Regional Atmosphe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, high-resolution atmospheric simulations have been applied to study how meteorological conditions may shape the soaring behaviour of migrating birds [10,15]. Our study demonstrates the advantages of using detailed atmospheric modelling and rigorously tests predictions related to the effects of external factors (wind vectors) on commuting flyers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, high-resolution atmospheric simulations have been applied to study how meteorological conditions may shape the soaring behaviour of migrating birds [10,15]. Our study demonstrates the advantages of using detailed atmospheric modelling and rigorously tests predictions related to the effects of external factors (wind vectors) on commuting flyers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Model steps were calculated every minute, and modelled wind data were spatially and temporally matched to each bat's location and averaged over every 5 min of the bat's commuting flight. Because no wind data were available from the study area, we report error estimates from a different application of RAMS [15]. Based on these error estimates, 95% of the wind data estimates are within 0.7 m s 21 of their actual value, with up to 2.4 m s 21 difference under strong (8 m s 21 ) but rare winds.…”
Section: (B) Atmospheric Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[10][11][12]; but see [13] for an exception). However, it is long established that many species use multiple modes of subsidized flight [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%