2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108990363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration Myths and the End of the Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean

Abstract: This Element looks critically at migration scenarios proposed for the end of the Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean. After presenting some historical background to the development of migration studies, including types and definitions of migration as well as some of its possible material correlates, I consider how we go about studying human mobility and issues regarding 'ethnicity'. There follows a detailed and critical examination of the history of research related to migration and ethnicity in the southe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 136 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is curious that scholarship in archaeology informed by the notion of a third space has tended to filter out the conflictory elements of Bhabha’s formulation while foregrounding those collaborative, productive processes that may arise out of this ambivalent tumultuous state, in particular hybridities and entanglements (e.g. van Dommelen 1997, 307; 2005, 117–18, 136; Fahlander 2007; Myhre 2005; Varberg 2007; Vives‐Ferrándiz Sánchez 2008; Knapp 2010; 2012, 33, 46; van Dommelen and Rowlands 2012, 28; Maran and Stockhammer 2012; Stockhammer 2012a; 2013, 15). Yet it is clear from a close reading of Bhabha that aside from its creative potentiality such a space will also harbour the inchoate, confused, contested and incoherent – an ‘enunciatory disorder’ (Bhabha 1994, 126).…”
Section: Inbetweennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is curious that scholarship in archaeology informed by the notion of a third space has tended to filter out the conflictory elements of Bhabha’s formulation while foregrounding those collaborative, productive processes that may arise out of this ambivalent tumultuous state, in particular hybridities and entanglements (e.g. van Dommelen 1997, 307; 2005, 117–18, 136; Fahlander 2007; Myhre 2005; Varberg 2007; Vives‐Ferrándiz Sánchez 2008; Knapp 2010; 2012, 33, 46; van Dommelen and Rowlands 2012, 28; Maran and Stockhammer 2012; Stockhammer 2012a; 2013, 15). Yet it is clear from a close reading of Bhabha that aside from its creative potentiality such a space will also harbour the inchoate, confused, contested and incoherent – an ‘enunciatory disorder’ (Bhabha 1994, 126).…”
Section: Inbetweennessmentioning
confidence: 99%