“…It is curious that scholarship in archaeology informed by the notion of a third space has tended to filter out the conflictory elements of Bhabha’s formulation while foregrounding those collaborative, productive processes that may arise out of this ambivalent tumultuous state, in particular hybridities and entanglements (e.g. van Dommelen 1997, 307; 2005, 117–18, 136; Fahlander 2007; Myhre 2005; Varberg 2007; Vives‐Ferrándiz Sánchez 2008; Knapp 2010; 2012, 33, 46; van Dommelen and Rowlands 2012, 28; Maran and Stockhammer 2012; Stockhammer 2012a; 2013, 15). Yet it is clear from a close reading of Bhabha that aside from its creative potentiality such a space will also harbour the inchoate, confused, contested and incoherent – an ‘enunciatory disorder’ (Bhabha 1994, 126).…”