Abstract:Children with a mild fetal pyelectasis do not have more urinary tract morbidity during childhood than children without this finding. Therefore, there seems to be no need for additional investigation after birth.
“…In a questionnaire-based study Damon-Elias and associates [30] investigated the clinical outcome of 146 children with mild dilatation (AP diameter 5e10 mm) at 4e9 years of age. Information on medical history was obtained from the parents of children with antenatally detected dilatation and compared with information provided by the parents of 250 age-matched normal controls.…”
“…In a questionnaire-based study Damon-Elias and associates [30] investigated the clinical outcome of 146 children with mild dilatation (AP diameter 5e10 mm) at 4e9 years of age. Information on medical history was obtained from the parents of children with antenatally detected dilatation and compared with information provided by the parents of 250 age-matched normal controls.…”
“…Other investigators have suggested that mild RPD (<10 mm) is rarely linked to significant abnormality and not predictive of urinary tract morbidity in childhood. What is interesting from our study is that despite extensive investigations, no obvious cause for the RPD was identified in 16.5% of cases.…”
An obstructive cause is usually present in severe cases, which are more likely to require surgery if there is PUJ obstruction. A high male:female ratio was present in this group.
“…Since the reviewed articles yielded only 79 patients with long‐term follow‐up, our data do not contribute to this discussion. However, based on data collected in our own patients, we do not perform postnatal follow‐up for PNH detected with an APD of < 10 mm30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2 we propose a flow diagram for a standard follow‐up protocol and adequate recording of data. This diagram is based mainly on previous work in our hospital30. Although we are aware of the fact that many clinicians will find performing a standard VCUG (and ultrasound exam) too invasive, we think that evidence supporting that opinion needs to be produced.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.