Military and Control of Land Resources? Conflict TNI and Magelang City Government

Setiawan, Hendy

doi:10.53341/jgpi.v1i1.4

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current condition is increasingly worrying because the spread of the virus is getting higher, while health facilities in some areas are on the verge of collapse. In the midst of the pandemic, Indonesia is also facing deteriorating democratic living conditions (Khalyubi, 2021;Setiawan, 2021). Democratic channels are considered not functioning as before the pandemic (Habibi, 2021).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discourse on Reporting Political Campaign Funds in Regional Head Elections in Indonesia

Djamal

2022

jclp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the regional head election discourse, reporting campaign funds is a central issue in realizing democratic practices that comply with the rules. This study aims to discuss the issue of reporting campaign funds in the implementation of regional head elections in Indonesia. Through a qualitative approach with descriptive narratives and the instruments used are interviews with informants who understand the issue of campaign finance reporting, especially in the 2020 regional head election. The use of the campaign finance information system application is considered effective in reporting campaign funds if it is judged by the ease of access, the usefulness of time, and disclosure of information in unraveling the chaotic reporting of campaign funds at every political stage. Although the issue of verification of report data is a concern that needs to be constantly criticized so that related parties can improve the quality of verification according to an open and sustainable procedure.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discourse on Reporting Political Campaign Funds in Regional Head Elections in Indonesia

Djamal

2022

jclp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, some forms of political strategy, particularly electoral mobilization and negotiations with local elites, were also adopted to strengthen and win the struggle. Many local farmers' unions and other agrarian organizations such as SPP, Bengkulu Farmers Union (STaB), Batang Regency Farmers Association Forum (FPPB), Nahdliyin Front for Natural Resources Sovereignty (FNKSDA), to the Alliance of Indigenous Peoples of the Archipelago (AMAN), are involved in various types of electoral battles, from village head elections (pilkades) to pilkada, with varying degrees of success [34].…”

Section: How the Agrarian Movement Answers The Problem Of Indonesian ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Democratic Political Articulation

Habibi¹,

Budiman²,

Laksmi³

et al. 2022

Proceedings of the Tegal International Conference on Applied Social Science &Amp; Humanities (TICASSH 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The complexity of agrarian issues also affects the quality of democracy in Indonesia. However, most recent studies have not comprehensively discussed the relationship between the two. By taking references from agrarian and democratic studies, this paper discusses the relationship between agrarian issues and democracy in Indonesia, especially in the post-authoritarian era. Here, several arguments are put forward. First, the four main agrarian issues in Indonesia land grabbing, the rate of class differentiation in rural contexts, socio-economic disparities, and the quality of local democracy have a significant impact on the conditions and trajectory of Indonesia's democracy. Second, the dynamic agrarian movement also contributes to the deepening process of democracy. Finally, this paper discusses several possible political prescriptions and policies to address agrarian issues to improve the quality of democracy in Indonesia.

show abstract

The Nusantara Capital City Project: Why Development and Human Rights Do Not Always Mix

Buana

Listiningrum

Nugroho³

et al. 2022

Law and Development Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the Nusantara capital city project and its sociological impact on individuals and groups’ rights in the East Kalimantan regions of Penajam Paser Utara (PPU) and Kutai Kartanegara. The Nusantara Act was enacted to legalize the building of this mega-project and was finalized within a period of only 43 days. Thus, the legitimation of the Act is contentious. It is predicted that there will be widespread political, cultural, environmental and economic effects that will be likely to affect society in general and marginalized groups in particular. It raises two important questions, “what are the public rights that could potentially be breached by the Nusantara development project?” and “Is it possible to identify the influence of national and local elites on the process of promoting and legitimizing the Nusantara Act?” This article describes the concept of Nusantara as stipulated in the Act, which is linked to human rights values that are specifically related to the right to development. Based on the mentioned framework, this article finds evidence of autocratic practices in terms of the government’s efforts to acquire land for the project. It has been found that these dictatorial practices have been exacerbated by ‘cooperation’ with extractive industries and local elites. As a result, indigenous groups and the local communities in the area have suffered a loss of autonomy and land rights due to lack of legal protection within the Act.

show abstract

Military and Control of Land Resources? Conflict TNI and Magelang City Government

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Discourse on Reporting Political Campaign Funds in Regional Head Elections in Indonesia

Discourse on Reporting Political Campaign Funds in Regional Head Elections in Indonesia

Democratic Political Articulation

The Nusantara Capital City Project: Why Development and Human Rights Do Not Always Mix

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About