1987
DOI: 10.1177/0022002787031001007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Burden, Security Needs, and Economic Growth in the Middle East

Abstract: Economic theory and existing empirical studies do not unambiguously indicate whether higher military expenditures retard or promote economic growth, nor have there been systematic attempts to discern the sources of military spending to help determine how much of that spending can realistically be reduced. This article examines the theoretical link between military spending and economic growth, explores the domestic and regional causes of this spending, and tests a model incorporating a simultaneous relationshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
2
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative effect on investment has knock-on effect on growth. There are a number of studies that applied SEM; see for instance Deger and Sen (1983), Deger (1986), Lebovic and Ishaq (1987), Gyimah-Brempong (1989), Dunne andMohammed (1995) Galvin (2003). 4 Finally, considerable empirical studies of milexp-growth apply some variant of Barro-type growth specifications.…”
Section: The Three Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effect on investment has knock-on effect on growth. There are a number of studies that applied SEM; see for instance Deger and Sen (1983), Deger (1986), Lebovic and Ishaq (1987), Gyimah-Brempong (1989), Dunne andMohammed (1995) Galvin (2003). 4 Finally, considerable empirical studies of milexp-growth apply some variant of Barro-type growth specifications.…”
Section: The Three Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some studies which argue in support of the positive growth effects of military spending. In his seminal works, Benoit (1973Benoit ( , 1978 show The second group of studies point out the negative growth effects of military spending through different channels such as lower saving rates and investment, reduction of other productive spending (health and education), higher budget deficit, higher debt, increase of corruption, higher tax rates and lower productivity of private sector and lower capital formation and resource extraction (see, for example, Deger 1986;Chan 1988;Lebovic and Ishaq, 1987;Mintz and Huang, 1990;Scheetz, 1991;Asseery, 1996;Dunne and Vougas, 1999;Gupta et al, 2001;and Dunne et al, 2002). Chowdhury (1991) examines the Granger causality between military spending and economic growth for the 55 developing countries.…”
Section: -Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Eken et al (1997)] Thus it is important to identify which government functions are productive and which are not. While there have been several attempts to investigate the relationship between military expenditures and economic growth for Mid-East countries, [Askari and Corbo (1974), Cohen and Ward (1996), DeRouen, K. (1995), Lebovic and Ishaq (1987), among others] to the best of our knowledge there have been no investigations of the causal relationship between the various components of government spending separated into productive and nonproductive spending and economic growth.…”
Section: Among Others]mentioning
confidence: 99%