1981
DOI: 10.2527/jas1981.5251091x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk Composition and Daily Yield of Different Milk Components as Affected by Sow Condition and Lactation/Feeding Regimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we did not observe any differences in MY between trials, and therefore we averaged out the data. A number of factors have been reported to affect milk production and composition (Darragh and Moughan, 1998), but there are data to support the idea that the provision of milk nutrients to the piglet does not depend strictly upon the supply of dietary nutrients to the dam due to the mobilization of sow reserves (Klaver et al, 1981;Clowes et al, 1998;, a factor that declines as fat reserves are depleted (Noblet and Etienne, 1986). The feeding regime throughout nursing in our study resulted in average daily weight losses in the range of 400 to 550 g/day and did not affect MY.…”
Section: My and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we did not observe any differences in MY between trials, and therefore we averaged out the data. A number of factors have been reported to affect milk production and composition (Darragh and Moughan, 1998), but there are data to support the idea that the provision of milk nutrients to the piglet does not depend strictly upon the supply of dietary nutrients to the dam due to the mobilization of sow reserves (Klaver et al, 1981;Clowes et al, 1998;, a factor that declines as fat reserves are depleted (Noblet and Etienne, 1986). The feeding regime throughout nursing in our study resulted in average daily weight losses in the range of 400 to 550 g/day and did not affect MY.…”
Section: My and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction was made to avoid any underestimation of the milk consumed by the piglets, as it takes into account weight losses due to physical activity and evaporation during suckling. To estimate this correction term, complementary observations in piglets from the four nursing sows were made between days 1 and 34 as described by Klaver et al (1981). As piglets are generally quite restless during suckling, only weight losses corresponding to high and medium activities were used to calculate the correction factor.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited mobilization of body tissue can probably be attributed to the high levels of feeding (ad libitum) [10]. In the group of multiparous sows rather important individual variations in milk yield and in milk production per weaned piglet were observed [16].…”
Section: Factors Affecting Milk Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the measured milk intake of these piglets was replaced by the average milk intake over the other measurements of the day. During the sucklings, the litter weight gain was also corrected by weight losses due to water evaporation and metabolism between weighings according to Klaver et al [ 10]. The sows were weighed next day after farrowing and immediately after weaning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composition quality of colostrum depends on many different factors relating to the dam, including nutrition (Noblet and Etienne, 1986;Gö ransson, 1990;Migdal, 1991), genetics (Fahmy, 1972;Zou et al, 1992), body condition at parturition (Klaver et al, 1981), health status (Gooneratne et al, 1982) and age. The composition of colostrum has been studied (Darragh and Moughan, 1998) and is known to vary considerably between animals for the reasons stated above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%