2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0022029911000690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk yield and somatic cell count during the following lactation after selective treatment of cows at dry-off

Abstract: Selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) has received increasing attention in recent years owing to global concerns over agricultural use of antimicrobial drugs and development of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of SDCT on milk yield and somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy herds in the USA. Cows in four Ohio dairy herds were categorized into two groups (low-SCC and high-SCC) at dry-off based on their SCC and clinical mastitis (CM) history during the lactation preceding th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
48
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
48
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because the final model also controlled for previous lactation milk production, this finding actually reflected the greater capacity of second parity cows to increase their milk production over the previous lactation than higher parity cows. This, coupled with the significant positive association between previous lactation production and current production, is in agreement with Rajala-Schultz et al (2011). Season of calving as a predictor of milk production has also been explored elsewhere, and the results of this trial are in accord with previous research (Wilmink, 1987;Rajala-Schultz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Test-day Milk Productionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because the final model also controlled for previous lactation milk production, this finding actually reflected the greater capacity of second parity cows to increase their milk production over the previous lactation than higher parity cows. This, coupled with the significant positive association between previous lactation production and current production, is in agreement with Rajala-Schultz et al (2011). Season of calving as a predictor of milk production has also been explored elsewhere, and the results of this trial are in accord with previous research (Wilmink, 1987;Rajala-Schultz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Test-day Milk Productionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, when selection procedures were put in place, DCT lost its production-related effect. According to Rajala-Schultz et al (2011), there was no effect of DCT on milk production when BDCT was compared with no treatment in cows with a low SCC and no clinical mastitis before drying off. This is in agreement with the current study, further demonstrating the importance of the selection protocol for SDCT.…”
Section: Test-day Milk Productionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Decisionmaking can be based on bacteriological culture (Robinson et al, 1988;Browning et al, 1990), SCC, and CM history (Rindsig et al, 1978;Torres et al, 2008;Rajala-Schultz et al, 2011), the California Mastitis Test (Rindsig et al, 1978;Bhutto et al, 2012), and N-acetylβ-d-glucosaminidase (Hassan et al, 1999), with different accuracies in identification of infected cows. When used in herds with low bulk milk SCC (<250,000 cells/ mL) to diagnose IMI in cows with a low SCC (<200,000 cells/mL) before drying off, a Petrifilm-based (3M, Minneapolis, MN) on-farm culture system for SDCT performed well, with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 73% (Cameron et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correctly select cows for curative use of antimicrobials in DCT, IMI at drying off need to be identified. This identification can be based on different criteria, such as SCC, bacteriological culture, and CM history (Torres et al, 2008;Rajala-Schultz et al, 2011). Herdlevel parameters, such as bulk milk SCC can also be taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For differences between herds we used multilevel models adjusted for random herd effects. Herds may differ in their pathogen prevalence and environmental management, thus dry cow treatment effects can be very different between herds (Halasa et al, 2009;Rajala-Schultz et al, 2011). For that reason the number of cows per herd was maximized, forcing us to include a high number of herds in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%