2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/irs.2015.7226386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millimeter wave propagation above the sea surface during the Squirrel campaign

Abstract: This contribution reports about experimental activities during the 2011 Squirrel campaign in the Baltic Sea, where a number of in-and outbound runs of the Mittelgrund research vessel were measured by the Fraunhofer FHR MEMPHIS Radar in sea configuration at both Ka and W band. Aboard the employed vessel, four cornerreflectors (CR) at different heights in forward and backward direction where mounted in order to measure the signature of the CRs along the inbound-and outbound trajectories. The parabolic wave equat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Danklmayer et al [17] introduces a novel sea-to-sea wave propagation method to mitigate sea clutter in maritime radar applications. This approach enhances sensing signals, improving radar cross section (RCS) returns for small boats through space diversity effects [18].…”
Section: Figure 1 Example Of Conventional Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Danklmayer et al [17] introduces a novel sea-to-sea wave propagation method to mitigate sea clutter in maritime radar applications. This approach enhances sensing signals, improving radar cross section (RCS) returns for small boats through space diversity effects [18].…”
Section: Figure 1 Example Of Conventional Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of measurement campaigns have also been conducted in the Baltic sea, mainly focused on studying evaporation ducts. During these campaigns a combination of in situ measurements, radiosondes, and microwave measurements were performed and reported (see, e.g., Scholz and Förster, 2003;Förster et al, 2004;Essen et al, 2004;Förster and Riechen, 2006;Essen et al, 2012;Danklmayer et al, 2013Danklmayer et al, , 2015Danklmayer et al, , 2016a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%