2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milling error prediction and compensation in machining of low-rigidity parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A good agreement between the numerical and experimental data shows the validity of the presented FEM-based milling simulation model in handling real-field problems. The main advantages of the presented system over previous works [7,9,[17][18][19] and the traditional computer-aided manufacturing) software [2,23,24] are the following:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good agreement between the numerical and experimental data shows the validity of the presented FEM-based milling simulation model in handling real-field problems. The main advantages of the presented system over previous works [7,9,[17][18][19] and the traditional computer-aided manufacturing) software [2,23,24] are the following:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The geometric model can also be a solid model using Voxels [18], Dexels [19] ( Fig. 25.5) or Triple-Nailboard (Fig.…”
Section: Geometric Model Of the Workpiecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial work of applying TFEA to the delay equations can be found in Ref. [5]. The main idea of TFEA is that the dynamic behavior of the milling process is governed by TFEA as a discrete linear map which relates the vibration response while the tool tooth is engaged in the cut, which depends on previous tooth passages and therefore includes the time delay  , to free vibration while the tooth is not engaged in the cut.…”
Section: Deterministic Model For Predicting Milling Stability and Calmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct trial-and-error approach is often expensive and time consuming. Producing the right profile in such parts increasingly depends on specialized CAD/CAE/CAM packages for defining appropriate cutting strategies and tool paths [4][5][6][7]. However, most of the existing techniques and models are based on idealised geometries and do not take into account factors such as variable cutting force, part/tool deflection, machining stability [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%