2004
DOI: 10.1148/rg.24si045505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimics of Renal Colic: Alternative Diagnoses at Unenhanced Helical CT

Abstract: During the past decade, unenhanced computed tomography (CT) has become the standard of reference in the detection of urinary calculi owing to its high sensitivity (>95%) and specificity (>98%) in this setting. Numerous diseases may manifest as acute flank pain and mimic urolithiasis. Up to one-third of unenhanced CT examinations performed because of flank pain may reveal unsuspected findings unrelated to stone disease, many of which can help explain the patient's condition. Alternative diagnoses are most commo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
40
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study are in accordance with the 2006 study, with an overall positive rate of 47.5%, female positive rate of 26.8% and male positive rate of 61.6%. The rate of alternative diagnosis is also essentially unchanged (10% in our study vs 12% in 2006) and consistent, but at the lower end of the range, with a quoted range of 9-29% for patients presenting with flank pain [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The results of our study are in accordance with the 2006 study, with an overall positive rate of 47.5%, female positive rate of 26.8% and male positive rate of 61.6%. The rate of alternative diagnosis is also essentially unchanged (10% in our study vs 12% in 2006) and consistent, but at the lower end of the range, with a quoted range of 9-29% for patients presenting with flank pain [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…One of the reasons for this disagreement may be related to the "window" utilized in the examination. It is important to note that this is a non-specific finding also observed in cases of previous inflammatory process sequela in vascular disease, trauma (6) or urinary tract obstruction (22) . All of the other (renal, perirenal and extrarenal) findings showed a statistically significant interobserver agreement (p = 0.005) ranging between moderate and almost perfect, despite the different levels of experience of the observers and the subjectivity in the evaluation of some findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Some of the alternative diagnoses are congenital renal anomalies, infections (appendicitis, diverticulitis, pancreatitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, cholecystitis, colitis, pyelonephritis), aortic aneurysm and dissection, ovarian cysts and neoplasms (renal, uterine and adnexal masses) (Figs. 18, 19) (11,50,51).…”
Section: Alternative Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indications for contrast-enhanced CT evaluation (based on unenhanced CT findings) are: i) presence of unilateral perinephric stranding without hydroureteronephrosis with or without renal enlargement (acute renal infarction, renal vein thrombosis, acute pyelonephritis); ii) significant hypo-/ hyperdense perirenal collection (urinoma, hematoma) with or without the b a presence of hydroureteronephrosis; iii) presence of a mass or complicated cyst with/without calculus; iv) negative unenhanced CT findings in a patient with unexplained hematuria (52). Common clinical conditions requiring contrastenhanced CT after unenhanced CT scan in a patient presenting with flank pain and hematuria are infections, neoplasms, renal cyst complications, vascular lesions, urinoma and acute perirenal hematoma, of which imaging findings are already defined elsewhere (51)(52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: When Should the Intravenous Contrast Be Given?mentioning
confidence: 99%