2021
DOI: 10.5817/cz.muni.m210-9884-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimoprávní vlivy na rozhodování českého Ústavního soudu

Abstract: The book studies other than purely legal factors that influence the Czech Constitutional Court judges in their decision-making. The publication is inspired by foreign models of judicial decision-making and discusses their applicability in the Czech environment. More specifically, it focuses, for example, on the influence of the judge’s personality, collegiality, strategic decision-making or the impact of public opinion and the media. The book is based mainly on interviews with current constitutional judges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are in line with the existing literature on political fragmentation. 67 Furthermore, the Czech technocratic populism of Andrej Babiš differs substantially from the ethnopopulism of Viktor Orbán or Jarosław Kaczyński. Hungarian and Polish versions of populism, with their significant nationalist emphasis and portrayal of various external enemies, has a higher mobilisation potential than general boilerplate about corruption and state-management by experts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are in line with the existing literature on political fragmentation. 67 Furthermore, the Czech technocratic populism of Andrej Babiš differs substantially from the ethnopopulism of Viktor Orbán or Jarosław Kaczyński. Hungarian and Polish versions of populism, with their significant nationalist emphasis and portrayal of various external enemies, has a higher mobilisation potential than general boilerplate about corruption and state-management by experts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%