2013
DOI: 10.13008/2151-2957.1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Mind the Gaps": Hidden Purposes and Missing Internationalism in Scholarship on the Rhetoric of Science and Technology in Public Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We invite teacher–scholars to keep this ethical dilemma in mind as we continue these important lines of research and pedagogical innovations, but we hope that our interview results offer a useful starting place. Research in this area answers Condit’s (2013) call to achieve a more international focus in our research on health and medical rhetoric. At the same time, though, as technical communication scholars, we are uniquely positioned to make important new contributions to the knowledge base that has developed through decades of research on the NNES author’s situation, much of which has been generated by scholars in linguistics and related fields, but not in technical communication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We invite teacher–scholars to keep this ethical dilemma in mind as we continue these important lines of research and pedagogical innovations, but we hope that our interview results offer a useful starting place. Research in this area answers Condit’s (2013) call to achieve a more international focus in our research on health and medical rhetoric. At the same time, though, as technical communication scholars, we are uniquely positioned to make important new contributions to the knowledge base that has developed through decades of research on the NNES author’s situation, much of which has been generated by scholars in linguistics and related fields, but not in technical communication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This claim becomes especially important in light of Celeste Condit's charge that RSTEM scholarship often presumes an unreflectively anti-science stance (Condit, 2013). Rhetoricians of science are hardly alone in their skepticism about science's unvarnished goodness.…”
Section: The Ethical Casementioning
confidence: 99%