2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-018-0966-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindfulness and Empathy: Differential Effects of Explicit and Implicit Buddhist Teachings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies (Arredondo et al 2017;Hwang et al 2019;O'Donnell 2017;Shapiro et al 2005) did not report sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analysis (pre-and post-programme mean, pre-programme standard deviation and sample size were all required); therefore, effect sizes from 22 studies were calculated. Three studies required calculation to combine MBP groups (Bayot et al 2020;Mistretta et al 2018) and control groups (Gu et al 2018). The forest plot (Fig.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies (Arredondo et al 2017;Hwang et al 2019;O'Donnell 2017;Shapiro et al 2005) did not report sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analysis (pre-and post-programme mean, pre-programme standard deviation and sample size were all required); therefore, effect sizes from 22 studies were calculated. Three studies required calculation to combine MBP groups (Bayot et al 2020;Mistretta et al 2018) and control groups (Gu et al 2018). The forest plot (Fig.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers sought to directly compare the effects of an SG-MBI versus FG-MBI in a given population setting. More specifically, a community sample randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that while there were no differences in effects on empathy, the SG-MBI led to greater increases in self-compassion and subjective wellbeing, whereas the FG-MBI elicited greater improvements in mindfulness (Bayot et al 2019). Another non-clinical sample head-to-head study found that while both the FG-MBI and SG-MBI led to improvements in stress, life satisfaction and self-awareness, the SG-MBI out-performed the FG-MBI on personal growth and prosocial behaviour outcomes (i.e., donating money to charity) (Chen and Jordan 2019).…”
Section: Second-generation Mindfulness-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mindfulness practice and interventions have been associated with pro-social behavior (e.g., Condon, Desbordes, Miller, & DeSteno, 2013;Lim, Condon, & DeSteno, 2015), less aggression (Fix & Fix, 2013), and greater romantic relationship satisfaction (Barnes, Brown, Krusemark, Campbell, & Rogge, 2007;Karremans, Schellekens, & Kappen, 2017). However, reviews have reported that findings have been limited (e.g., Kreplin, Farias, & Brazil, 2018), mixed (e.g., Fix & Fix, 2013), or absent (e.g., Bayot, Vermeulen, Kever, & Mikolajczak, 2018), and the "how," "why," and "for whom" mindfulness works to improve relationships remain unclear (e.g., Karremans et al, 2017).…”
Section: Social Behaviors and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%