2019
DOI: 10.1111/acer.14053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindfulness‐Based Relapse Prevention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking: A Double‐Blind Sham‐Controlled Randomized Trial

Abstract: Background: Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have independently shown benefits for treating alcohol use disorder (AUD). Recent work suggests tDCS may enhance mindfulness. The combination of MBRP and tDCS may provide synergistic benefits and may target both behavioral and neurobiological dysfunctions in AUD. The goal of this double-blind sham-controlled randomized trial was to examine the efficacy of a rolling group MBRP treatment combined with tDCS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
17

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
39
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…At baseline and post-intervention, no effects of tDCS vs. sham stimulation on inhibitory control (SSRT) were reported. Moreover, tDCS had no effects on drinking-related outcomes [51]. Beyond this, preliminary analyses of an ongoing trial with combined tDCS and an inhibitory control training in children with ADHD showed no effect on clinical symptoms as well [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At baseline and post-intervention, no effects of tDCS vs. sham stimulation on inhibitory control (SSRT) were reported. Moreover, tDCS had no effects on drinking-related outcomes [51]. Beyond this, preliminary analyses of an ongoing trial with combined tDCS and an inhibitory control training in children with ADHD showed no effect on clinical symptoms as well [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…So far, the relevant tDCS training studies yielded mixed results. In a recent double-blind training study, patients with alcohol use disorder received anodal tDCS over rIFG during 8-weeks of meditation [51]. At baseline and post-intervention, no effects of tDCS vs. sham stimulation on inhibitory control (SSRT) were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At baseline and post-intervention, no effects of tDCS vs. sham stimulation on inhibitory control (SSRT) were reported. Moreover, tDCS had no effects on drinking-related outcomes(51).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“… Small sample size with large attrition rates through the 24-week follow-up in both groups (MPRB - 75%; ST - 78.57%). Witkiewitz et al, 2019 [ 42 ] MBRP + Active tDCS: 8, 120-min sessions with the first 30-min consisting of tDCS. MBRP + sham tDCS: Standard MBRP + 8, 120-min sessions with the first 30-min consisting of tDCS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the efficacy of MBRP with active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was compared among individuals interested in decreasing their alcohol use [42]. Witkiewitz and colleagues' results demonstrated a decrease in drinks per drinking day over time among the sample as a whole and a significant dose effect for the number of groups attended.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%