Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural 2009
DOI: 10.3115/1690219.1690244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mine the easy, classify the hard

Abstract: Supervised polarity classification systems are typically domain-specific. Building these systems involves the expensive process of annotating a large amount of data for each domain. A potential solution to this corpus annotation bottleneck is to build unsupervised polarity classification systems. However, unsupervised learning of polarity is difficult, owing in part to the prevalence of sentimentally ambiguous reviews, where reviewers discuss both the positive and negative aspects of a product. To address this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Pang and Lee (2004) examined the relation between subjectivity and polarity classification; Kennedy and Inkpen (2006) identified three types of valence shifters: negations, intensifiers, and diminishers; and Wilson et al (2009) explored the difference between prior and contextual polarity and recognized the importance of identifying neutral instances. Some studies deal with scenarios for sentiment classification that are more complicated, such as cross-domain adaptation (Blitzer et al, 2007; and semi-supervised learning (Dasgupta & Ng 2009;Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: A Emotion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Pang and Lee (2004) examined the relation between subjectivity and polarity classification; Kennedy and Inkpen (2006) identified three types of valence shifters: negations, intensifiers, and diminishers; and Wilson et al (2009) explored the difference between prior and contextual polarity and recognized the importance of identifying neutral instances. Some studies deal with scenarios for sentiment classification that are more complicated, such as cross-domain adaptation (Blitzer et al, 2007; and semi-supervised learning (Dasgupta & Ng 2009;Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: A Emotion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pang et al [3] used machine learning methods such as naive Bayesian classifier, maximum entropy classifier and support vector machine (SVM) to train unigram, bigram, position features and part-of-speech (POS) tag to distinguish comments as positive or negative sentiment. Dasgupta and Ng [4] considered the occurrence of emotionally ambiguous comments and proposed a semi-supervised method. Onan et al [5] combined keyword-based text document representation with integrated learning to improve the predictive performance of scientific text document classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%