2001
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00574-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineral mass, size, and estimated mechanical strength of triple jumpers’ lower limb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
70
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
12
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant increase in Ct.Dn at the diaphyseal sites (14, 38 and 66%) is in contrast to cross-sectional studies reporting no differences in volumetric Ct.Dn between athletic populations and controls [21,23] or between the playing and contralateral limb in tennis players [44]. Changes in Ct.Dn have not been demonstrated with short exercise interventions [38] or long-term participation in high impact sports [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant increase in Ct.Dn at the diaphyseal sites (14, 38 and 66%) is in contrast to cross-sectional studies reporting no differences in volumetric Ct.Dn between athletic populations and controls [21,23] or between the playing and contralateral limb in tennis players [44]. Changes in Ct.Dn have not been demonstrated with short exercise interventions [38] or long-term participation in high impact sports [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported in cross-sectional studies of athletes using peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT), which describe a thicker cortex in the playing arm of tennis players [20], the tibia of triple jumpers [21] and in athletes from impact sports [22] compared with matched controls, with little or no differences in density [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Dynamic and repetitive exposure of the skeleton to external impact-loading and muscular-loading forces of sufficient intensity were hypothesized to contribute to the development and maintenance of the load-bearing capacity of the bone (40). Important components of osteogenic stimulus are high strain rates and high peak forces in versatile movements (41,42). Adaptation to loading seems to occur in a site-specific manner, by gross geometric changes, structural and architectural changes, or both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak vertical ground reaction forces are 12-20 times BW [42,43] for H-I exercise, 2.5-3.5 times BW [44][45][46] for O-I exercise, 2-3 times BW [47] for H-M exercise (squat), and 2-2.5 times BW [48,49] for R-I exercise while the estimated impact loading rates (BWs -1 ) are about 400-480 BWs -1 [42], 20-180 BWs -1 [44,45], 5-6 BWs -1 [47], and 60-150 BWs -1 [48][49][50], respectively. In swimming, peak reaction force and loading rate at the push-off phase of turning are estimated to be less than 1.5 times BW [51,52] and less than 10 BWs -1 [51], respectively.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the clear benefits, H-I exercise does not provide a panacea against hip fragility and fractures. Extreme impact forces (12-20 times BW) [42,43] in the H-I exercises are obviously too risky not only for older people but also for sedentary people regardless of age. Since the O-I and R-I exercises produce moderate impacts, the risk of musculoskeletal injuries remains lower.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%