2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal coherence among varied theory of mind measures in childhood and adulthood

Abstract: for their assistance.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
94
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
9
94
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental inference, then, may involve the coordinated usage of a collection of proficiencies and cognitive processes (Apperly, 2012;Gerrans & Stone, 2008;Schaafsma et al, 2015;Warnell & Redcay, 2019). Interactive inference may be one component of mental inference, but we hypothesize that it works in conjunction with (at a minimum) prior knowledge, such as dispositional and situational inferences (and their permutations, e.g.…”
Section: Mental Inference and A Sense Of Shouldmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mental inference, then, may involve the coordinated usage of a collection of proficiencies and cognitive processes (Apperly, 2012;Gerrans & Stone, 2008;Schaafsma et al, 2015;Warnell & Redcay, 2019). Interactive inference may be one component of mental inference, but we hypothesize that it works in conjunction with (at a minimum) prior knowledge, such as dispositional and situational inferences (and their permutations, e.g.…”
Section: Mental Inference and A Sense Of Shouldmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We use the term mental inference to stand in for all of these inferences about others' expectations, with the caveat that others' expectations may be formulated as high-level, abstract predictions about mental states, as low-level, concrete predictions about behaviors, or as predictions at any level of abstraction in between (Kozak et al, 2006;Vallacher & Wegner, 1987). There are many competing accounts of mental inference, and most likely a number of underlying proficiencies and/or cognitive processes that combine to facilitate it (Apperly, 2012;Gerrans & Stone, 2008;Schaafsma et al, 2015;Warnell & Redcay, 2019), but the core problem that accounts of mental inference aim to solve is this: How do people make inferences about others' minds (i.e. predictions generated by others' internal models) 13 , given that others' internal models cannot be directly observed.…”
Section: Mental Inference and A Sense Of Shouldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is clear evidence of jingle in the literature, highlighting the need to address questions of what constructs are and how they are measured at the individual study level. To list just a few: depression scales (Fried, 2017), emotion measurement (Weidman et al, 2016), behavioral tasks vs. self-reports of self-regulation (Eisenberg et al, 2019), theory of mind (Warnell & Redcay, 2019), and fear extinction retention (Lonsdorf et al, 2019) each measure different content and phenomena under the same construct name. The on-going debate as to whether measures of grit (perseverance and passion for long-term goals) and conscientiousness capture the same construct, given their correlation of 0.84 in a recent large meta-analysis (Credé et al, 2017), is a case of potential jangle.…”
Section: Why and How Do You Select Your Measure?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of "theory of mind" was used by the primatologists Premack and Woodruff (1978) to describe the skills for interpreting human behaviour in a mental sphere, in other words, the abilities of a person to infer and make assumptions regarding other people's emotions, feelings, affections, thoughts and intentions, and in turn, to act and influence their behaviour depending on these assumptions. According to Warnell and Redcay (2019), depending on the perspective to evaluate the theory of mind skills (task complexity, affective content or implicit or explicit responses) and population groups by age (pre-schoolers, children or adults), the results of said measurement will produce highly variable and poorly related data. Based on the above, this study assumes that ToM is a multidimensional process, but only one dimension will be evaluated from the perspective of affective content that reflects the recognition of emotional states from an adolescent's point of view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%