2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.93.032328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal control power of the controlled teleportation

Abstract: We generalize the control power of a perfect controlled teleportation of an entangled three-qubit pure state, suggested by Li and Ghose [Phys. Rev. A 90, 052305 (2014)], to the control power of a general controlled teleportation of a multiqubit pure state. Thus, we define the minimal control power, and calculate the values of the minimal control power for a class of general three-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states and the three-qubit W class whose states have zero threetangles. Moreover, we show th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known that in a pure-state regime the generalized GHZ state and a group of W-class states 19 are useful for controlled teleportation 18 . In order to verify whether mixed states which belong to GHZ-class and W-class are also suitable for CQT both fidelities, given by Eqs ( 5 ) and ( 6 ), need to be determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is well-known that in a pure-state regime the generalized GHZ state and a group of W-class states 19 are useful for controlled teleportation 18 . In order to verify whether mixed states which belong to GHZ-class and W-class are also suitable for CQT both fidelities, given by Eqs ( 5 ) and ( 6 ), need to be determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an unknown state of a single qubit can be teleported from sender to receiver with fidelity only with the permission of the controller. Without controller’s participation the teleportation fidelity (henceforth referred to as the non-conditioned fidelity F NC ) is no better than the fidelity of a classical channel, 17 , 18 . Here, the question whether entanglement is a necessary resource for CQT is much more sophisticated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it would be interesting to expand our analysis of losses and optical encodings to the multiqubit scenario discussed in [52,53]. In particular, it may be the case that the interplay between dissipation and non-orthogonality, appearing in the coherent states, may have consequences in the minimal control power [53]. Additionally, as damping impacts the knowledge the controller has on the channel (changes the state entropy), it might be of interest to include losses in the discussion proposed in [54].…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller in each protocol can control the channel capacity and the teleportation fidelity of the other two parties, respectively. Recently, the concepts of control power (CP) and minimal control power (MCP) of the controlled teleportation have been suggested to quantify how much teleportation fidelity can be controlled by the controller [18][19][20][21] . CP is defined as the difference between teleportation fidelities with and without the controller's assistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%