2020
DOI: 10.1134/s199508022002002x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Equivalence Relations in Hyperarithmetical and Analytical Hierarchies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It concentrates on two main focuses: first, to calculate the complexity of natural equivalence relations on , proving, e.g., that provable equivalence in Peano Arithmetic is -complete [9], Turing equivalence on c.e. sets is -complete [18], and the isomorphism relations on several familiar classes of computable structures (e.g., trees, torsion abelian groups, and fields of characteristic or p ) are -complete [14]; secondly, to understand the structure of the collection of equivalence relations of a certain complexity (e.g., lying at some level of the arithmetical [10], analytical [8], or Ershov hierarchy [7, 21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It concentrates on two main focuses: first, to calculate the complexity of natural equivalence relations on , proving, e.g., that provable equivalence in Peano Arithmetic is -complete [9], Turing equivalence on c.e. sets is -complete [18], and the isomorphism relations on several familiar classes of computable structures (e.g., trees, torsion abelian groups, and fields of characteristic or p ) are -complete [14]; secondly, to understand the structure of the collection of equivalence relations of a certain complexity (e.g., lying at some level of the arithmetical [10], analytical [8], or Ershov hierarchy [7, 21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It concentrates on two main focuses: first, to calculate the complexity of natural equivalence relations on ω, proving, e.g., that provable equivalence in Peano Arithmetic is Σ 0 1 -complete [9], Turing equivalence on c.e. sets is Σ 0 4 -complete [18], and the isomorphism relations on several familiar classes of computable structures (e.g., trees, torsion abelian groups, fields of characteristic 0 or p) are Σ 1 1 -complete [13]; secondly, to investigate the poset of degrees generated by computable reducibility on the collection of equivalence relations of a certain complexity Γ, e.g., lying at some level of the arithmetical [10], analytical [7], or Ershov hierarchy [8,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%