1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)42100-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal essential domains specifying toxicity of the light chains of tetanus toxin and botulinum neurotoxin type A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a destabilizing amino acid at the N‐terminus of a toxin were sufficient to make the protein unstable in the cytosol, one would expect that throughout evolution there would have been a selection against destabilizing amino acids at the N‐termini of toxic proteins that reach the cytosol. Therefore, we investigated the published N‐termini of some of the toxin domains that are believed to enter the cytosol (DeLange et al ., 1979; Lamb et al ., 1985; Nicosia et al ., 1986; Calderwood et al ., 1987; Yamamoto et al ., 1987; Escuyer et al ., 1988; Strockbine et al ., 1988; Bragg and Robertson, 1989; Ogata et al ., 1990; Krieglstein et al ., 1991; Wood et al ., 1991; Kurazono et al ., 1992; Huguet Soler et al ., 1996), but we could not find any systematic exclusion of destabilizing residues at the N‐termini of the toxin domains. Although it cannot be formally excluded that minor modifications of the N‐termini of these proteins occur upon translocation, the data suggest that placing a destabilizing residue at the N‐terminus may often not be sufficient to make a protein unstable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a destabilizing amino acid at the N‐terminus of a toxin were sufficient to make the protein unstable in the cytosol, one would expect that throughout evolution there would have been a selection against destabilizing amino acids at the N‐termini of toxic proteins that reach the cytosol. Therefore, we investigated the published N‐termini of some of the toxin domains that are believed to enter the cytosol (DeLange et al ., 1979; Lamb et al ., 1985; Nicosia et al ., 1986; Calderwood et al ., 1987; Yamamoto et al ., 1987; Escuyer et al ., 1988; Strockbine et al ., 1988; Bragg and Robertson, 1989; Ogata et al ., 1990; Krieglstein et al ., 1991; Wood et al ., 1991; Kurazono et al ., 1992; Huguet Soler et al ., 1996), but we could not find any systematic exclusion of destabilizing residues at the N‐termini of the toxin domains. Although it cannot be formally excluded that minor modifications of the N‐termini of these proteins occur upon translocation, the data suggest that placing a destabilizing residue at the N‐terminus may often not be sufficient to make a protein unstable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical difficulties hitherto in expressing the L chain of BoNT/A in a heterologous host and subsequent isolation of the viable protein have limited molecular studies to those in the sea hare, Aplysia californica, where microinjection of L chain mRNA into the buccal ganglionic neurons caused a blockade of acetylcholine release (Kurazono et al, 1992). This technique allowed the importance of certain Nand C-terminal residues to be established from the observed loss of the neuroparalytic activity resulting from injection of mRNA encoding L chain deletion mutants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalytic activity of CNTs was discovered when the determination of their primary structure (Minton 1995) revealed the presence of the His-Glu-Xaa-Xaa-His zinc-binding zinc-endopeptidases motif (Kurazono et al 1992;Schiavo et al 1992b,c;Wright et al 1992). Building upon this observation, it was soon demonstrated that TeNT was blocking ACh release at synapses of the buccal ganglion of Aplysia californica via a zinc-dependent protease activity (Schiavo et al 1992a,b).…”
Section: Zinc-endopeptidase Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%