Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundAn immediate loss of strength follows virtually all types of muscle injury but there is debate whether the initial strength loss is maximal or if a secondary loss of strength occurs during the first 3 days post-injury.ObjectiveThe objective of this analysis was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature to determine if a secondary loss of strength occurs after an injurious initiating event.MethodsLiterature searches were performed using eight electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Cochrane Library). Search terms included skeletal muscle AND (injur* OR damage*) AND (strength OR force OR torque). The extracted strength data were converted to a standard format by calculating the standardized mean difference, which is reported as the effect size (ES) along with its 95 % confidence interval (CI). The calculation of ES was designed so that a negative ES that was statistically less than zero would be interpreted as indicating a secondary loss of strength.ResultsA total of 223 studies with over 4000 human and animal subjects yielded data on 262 independent groups and a total of 936 separate ESs. Our overall meta-analysis yielded a small-to-medium, positive overall ES that was statistically greater than zero (overall ES = +0.34, 95 % CI 0.27–0.40; P < 0.00000001). Considerable variation in ES was observed among studies (I 2 = 86 %), which could be partially explained by the research group conducting the study, sex of the subject, day of post-injury strength assessment, whether fatigue was present immediately post-injury, and the muscle group injured. From the subgroup meta-analyses probing these variables, 36 subgroup ESs were calculated and none were statistically less than zero.ConclusionOverall, our findings do not support the presence of a secondary loss of strength following an acute muscle injury, and strongly suggest that strength, on average, recovers steadily over the first 3 days post-injury.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0528-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

PGC-1α overexpression partially rescues impaired oxidative and contractile pathophysiology following volumetric muscle loss injury

“…4). This widespread effect of VML injury could be due to the excessive inflammatory response that occurs after the injury, which would support the notion of an inflammation-based bystander injury in the myofibers surrounding the initially injured area (55,56).…”

A moderate oestradiol level enhances neutrophil number and activity in muscle after traumatic injury but strength recovery is accelerated

“…However, our recent systematic review and meta‐analysis indicates that there is minimal evidence for a secondary injury, at least one that results in an additional strength loss (Warren et al . ). Furthermore, we have demonstrated in three previous studies that elimination of the cytokine tumour necrosis factor α, or the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (CCL2) and/or their receptors can impair the strength recovery of injured muscle (Warren et al .…”

Cryotherapy Reinvented: Application of Phase Change Material for Recovery in Elite Soccer

“…There is indeed evidence in humans that have shown a link between exercise-induced inflammation and isometric strength loss 25 , and some in animals showing that attenuating inflammation enhances the recovery of muscle function after muscle lengthening contraction 27 , which would support this proposition. Nonetheless, it is important to note that not all studies have found a link between inflammation and muscle function after muscledamaging exercise 28 . Thus, while such effects are plausible, without measuring inflammation this is somewhat speculative; this postulation needs to be tested experimentally to confirm this idea.…”