2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shakeel et al [42] present a systematic literature review with results that are vital both for healthcare managers and for prediction model developers to face COVID-19 pandemic. Hudda et al [123] show a systematic review of COVID-19 prediction models based on preprint and peer-reviewed published manuscripts, in order to assess the percentage of adherence between prediction and effective data. Instead, Zhang et al [124] systematically examine, in COVID-19 research, the application of three simulation approaches given by a system dynamics model, agent-based model and discrete event simulation, and their hybrids.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implications For Preventing Pandemic T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shakeel et al [42] present a systematic literature review with results that are vital both for healthcare managers and for prediction model developers to face COVID-19 pandemic. Hudda et al [123] show a systematic review of COVID-19 prediction models based on preprint and peer-reviewed published manuscripts, in order to assess the percentage of adherence between prediction and effective data. Instead, Zhang et al [124] systematically examine, in COVID-19 research, the application of three simulation approaches given by a system dynamics model, agent-based model and discrete event simulation, and their hybrids.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implications For Preventing Pandemic T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For over 50 years, problems of incomplete and poor reporting of research have been widely documented across health and medical research 1–3. Unusable research reports contribute to avoidable research waste4 through the inability to appraise and synthesise research and can detrimentally impact patient care through incorrect implementation of research findings 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%