2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Solutions for Relative Pose With a Single Affine Correspondence

Abstract: In this paper we present four cases of minimal solutions for two-view relative pose estimation by exploiting the affine transformation between feature points and we demonstrate efficient solvers for these cases. It is shown, that under the planar motion assumption or with knowledge of a vertical direction, a single affine correspondence is sufficient to recover the relative camera pose. The four cases considered are two-view planar relative motion for calibrated cameras as a closed-form and a least-squares sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the relative pose has a motion prior, there are simple and efficient solvers. For example, there are many customized solvers when the rotation axis is known [21], the motion is under planar motion [21], [22], or the depth of feature points is known [53].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the relative pose has a motion prior, there are simple and efficient solvers. For example, there are many customized solvers when the rotation axis is known [21], the motion is under planar motion [21], [22], or the depth of feature points is known [53].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several minimal solvers using ACs have been developed for different tasks. For single cameras, there are pose estimation methods for general 5 degrees of freedom (DOF) motion [17], 3DOF motion with known rotation axis [21], and 2DOF motion with planar motion [21], [22]. For multi-camera systems, there are pose estimation methods for motion with known rotation axis and planar motion [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barath et al [16,17] show that two affine correspondences are enough for relative pose estimation when the focal length is fixed and unknown. Recently, it has been shown that the relative pose can be estimated from one affine correspondence with known gravity direction or under the planar motion assumption [18,19]. However, a major drawback of using such features in practice is that obtaining them, e.g., via Affine-SIFT [20] or Harris-Affine [21], is time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eichhardt et al [14] proposed a method that uses two ACs for relative pose estimation based on general central-projective views. Recently, Hajder et al [19] and Guan et al [18] proposed minimal solutions for relative pose from a single AC when the camera is mounted on a moving vehicle. Homographies can also be estimated from two ACs as it was first shown by Köser [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%