1997
DOI: 10.1111/0029-4624.00041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimalism and Truth

Abstract: Minimalism about truth has received considerable attention of late. We think that much of the discussion suffers from a pair of deficiencies. First, there has been a failure to discriminate different varieties and dimensions of minimalism about truth. Second, some serious and fundamental problems for the most popular varieties of minimalism about truth have not yet received sufficient attention. This paper aims to remedy those deficiencies.The paper is divided into three sections. In the first section, we dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… One type of deflationism is Horwich's (1998) “minimalist” view. See Field 1994 for an alternative type of deflationism and O'Leary‐Hawthorne and Oppy 1997 for an overview of deflationist theories. It is also worth noting that another deflationary option here, which will not be discussed, is to take a deflationary view of facts, as opposed to an explicitly deflationary view of truth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… One type of deflationism is Horwich's (1998) “minimalist” view. See Field 1994 for an alternative type of deflationism and O'Leary‐Hawthorne and Oppy 1997 for an overview of deflationist theories. It is also worth noting that another deflationary option here, which will not be discussed, is to take a deflationary view of facts, as opposed to an explicitly deflationary view of truth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there are many kinds of views that could be described as “deflationary,” and the characterization provided here is intended to be as neutral as possible. See O'Leary‐Hawthorne and Oppy (1997) for a useful overview.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%