“…Therefore, a case-by-case optimization still seems to be necessary, being extremely difficult to reach a standardized procedure for every labeling precursor, which might explain the reason why the exact same methodology has been very rarely repeated in the literature. An analysis through the Cu-mediated works published, and hereby referenced [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], shows that [Cu(OTf) 2 (py) 4 ] is still by far the most common catalyst used (against other options such as Cu(OTf) 2 , Cu(OTf) 2 (associated with diverse pyridine derivatives), or Cu(CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 ), and the typical amounts for all of them are between 5 to 30 µmol while the Bpin labeling precursor may vary from 4 to 60 µmol. The reaction temperatures are usually kept around 120 °C ± 10 °C while anhydrous DMA and dimethylformamide (DMF) are the solvents almost exclusively reported, with the first one having the propensity for better conversion efficacies [39] which can arguably be due to its higher boiling point and resistance to bases.…”