2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-009-9174-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimalistic control of biped walking in rough terrain

Abstract: Toward our comprehensive understanding of legged locomotion in animals and machines, the compass gait model has been intensively studied for a systematic investigation of complex biped locomotion dynamics. While most of the previous studies focused only on the locomotion on flat surfaces, in this article, we tackle with the problem of bipedal locomotion in rough terrains by using a minimalistic control architecture for the compass gait walking model. This controller utilizes an open-loop sinusoidal oscillation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual and somatosensory feedback are also thought to be critical for walking (Gandevia, 2001). However, walking and standing are very different tasks (Kang and Dingwell, 2006) and passive dynamics likely play a greater role during walking (Srinivasan and Ruina, 2006; Iida and Tedrake, 2010). Patients with unilateral transtibial amputation retain intact visual and vestibular input, and mostly intact proprioception and motor function in their proximal impaired limb and contralateral limb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual and somatosensory feedback are also thought to be critical for walking (Gandevia, 2001). However, walking and standing are very different tasks (Kang and Dingwell, 2006) and passive dynamics likely play a greater role during walking (Srinivasan and Ruina, 2006; Iida and Tedrake, 2010). Patients with unilateral transtibial amputation retain intact visual and vestibular input, and mostly intact proprioception and motor function in their proximal impaired limb and contralateral limb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hip can exert a torque of [−20, 20] Nm. The swingleg dynamics of the compass gait model are given as [9] M(q)q + C(q,q)q + G(q) = Bu , where M is the mass matrix, C subsumes the centripetal and Coriolis forces, and G is the gravity matrix. The contact point of the stance leg with the ground is a zero-torque, frictionless joint.…”
Section: A Compass Gait Walker On An Inclining Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity present in achieving bipedal robotic walking, its study is often split into two extremes: theoretical results aimed at developing torque controllers (e.g., controlled symmetries [18], geometric reduction [6], [17], inverted pendulum [14], [10]) that are provably correct, and simulation/experimental results guided by heuristics (e.g., ZMP methods [21], [22], passivity based control [16], [11], reinforcement learning [12] and the central pattern generators [15]) that provide better real world behavior than complex nonlinear controllers can achieve. Both of these extremes are important in the study of robotic walking, yet to achieve truly human-like walking it is necessary to bridge the gap between these two methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%