2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2187-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of the thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosisMini-DLIF for the thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis

Abstract: BackgroundTo investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive direct lateral approach debridement, interbody bone grafting, and interbody fusion in the treatment of the thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.MethodsFrom January 2013 to January 2016, 35 cases with thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis received direct lateral approach debridement, interbody bone grafting, and interbody fusion. Of the 35 cases, 16 patients were male and 19 were female and the median age was 55.2 (range 25–83). The affec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arthroplasty was more appropriate for complete devastation of joint structure, with limited choices of reconstruction except artificial joint replacement [ 28 ]. For spine TB patients, they also received intervertebral disc fusion via minimal invasive operations [ 29 ]. In this study, 66 patients received joint arthrolysis and no arthroplasty was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthroplasty was more appropriate for complete devastation of joint structure, with limited choices of reconstruction except artificial joint replacement [ 28 ]. For spine TB patients, they also received intervertebral disc fusion via minimal invasive operations [ 29 ]. In this study, 66 patients received joint arthrolysis and no arthroplasty was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MISS can reduce spinal tissue injury, the amount of bleeding, postoperative complications and speed up postoperative rehabilitation (Lehman RA Jr, et al, 2005;Verdú-López F, et al, 2017;Zhang XF et al, 2010). During interventional therapy, CT-guided drainage and irrigation for abscess or focus of spinal tuberculosis have been proved to be a minimally invasive and safe operation, but there were some problems, such as long indwelling time of postoperative drainage tube, unable to completely remove the focus, long treatment cycle and so on (Gan F, et al, 2018;Zhang XF, et al, 2010). With the development of video-assisted thoracoscopy, this technique has been successfully used in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis (Kapoor SK, et al, 2005;Lv GH, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is typical in patients with a history of diverticulitis, radiotherapy to the abdomen, or previous abdominal surgery (nephrectomy or total colectomy). Gan et al treated thoracic and lumbar invasive tuberculosis with DLIF, they make the conclusion of less injury and quick recovery after surgery [15]. LLIF may be not suitable for active infection, but it can be used for those chronic diseases.…”
Section: Indications and Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%