2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the prone position allows better ventilation and oxygenation of the ipsilateral lung, which is blocked in the lateral decubitus position. The outcome of this study has been confirmed by other studies (17,18). Atelectasis could be promoted in the collapsed lung, which is a major contribution to post-operative respiratory infection (19).…”
Section: Logistic Regression For Pulmonary Morbiditysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Also, the prone position allows better ventilation and oxygenation of the ipsilateral lung, which is blocked in the lateral decubitus position. The outcome of this study has been confirmed by other studies (17,18). Atelectasis could be promoted in the collapsed lung, which is a major contribution to post-operative respiratory infection (19).…”
Section: Logistic Regression For Pulmonary Morbiditysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Se incluyeron en el estudio 33 pacientes (hombres 24; edad 69 [41-78] años; IMC 24 [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]) que se sometieron a una EMI, lo cual representa el 78% de las esofagectomías realizadas por cáncer esofágico en el período de estudio (Tabla 1).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A transhiatal approach has been suggested for patients with significant pulmonary co‐morbidity, owing to a reduced incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and because the need for single‐lung ventilation in obviated, and the present data may inform such discussions. However, minimally invasive approaches may produce similar benefits for patients with significant baseline pulmonary co‐morbidity, while producing favourable oncological outcomes even compared with open transthoracic resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%