2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07713-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer with persistent descending mesocolon: radiological findings and short-term outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
40
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
40
4
Order By: Relevance
“…12 On the other hand, Hanaoka et al reported that the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery were similar between PDM and non-PDM cases. 13 In our study there were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications between PDM and non-PDM patients, although the operative time tended to be longer in cases that required adhesiolysis and additional resection. A longer operative time led to more ileus in the PDM group, although this was not significant, and may have led to a longer postoperative hospital stay.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 On the other hand, Hanaoka et al reported that the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery were similar between PDM and non-PDM cases. 13 In our study there were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications between PDM and non-PDM patients, although the operative time tended to be longer in cases that required adhesiolysis and additional resection. A longer operative time led to more ileus in the PDM group, although this was not significant, and may have led to a longer postoperative hospital stay.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Wang et al reported that PDM prolonged operative times and increased bleeding during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery 12 . On the other hand, Hanaoka et al reported that the short‐term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery were similar between PDM and non‐PDM cases 13 . In our study there were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications between PDM and non‐PDM patients, although the operative time tended to be longer in cases that required adhesiolysis and additional resection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…We divided the mesentery, marginal artery, and the main branches from IMA extracorporeally prior to dissection of feeding artery and lymphadenectomy without blood flow impairment of the reconstructed colon. In the cases of colorectal cancer with PDM, a retrospective study suggested that 70% of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and left colic artery were divided extracorporeally, but 5.7% of them were divided extracorporeally [ 5 ]. Therefore, we can dissect the mesentery extracorporeally without touching the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortened mesentery in PDM in a conventional approach carries a higher risk of damage to the essential arteries that maintain the remnant blood flow [ 6 , 9 , 10 ]. Retrospective radiological findings suggested that the median distance between the IMA and the IMV was 14.8 mm and the IMV and the descending colon was 17.2 mm in PDM cases, compared with 23.0 mm and 90.0 mm in non-PDM cases, respectively [ 5 ]. Furthermore, in a typical laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, considering the safeness and oncological aspects, lymphadenectomy and division of vessels were often performed prior to mesenteric dissection with the no-touch isolation technique using conventional medial-to-lateral approach [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation