2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-004-0060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive therapies for prostatitis

Abstract: A plethora of reports describe a number of promising new minimally invasive treatment modalities available to patients with chronic prostatitis. This article reviews these studies, with most evaluating treatments using heat or intraprostatic injection. The results are difficult to compare because of the inconsistencies in study design, modalities of treatment, and outcome measures. Standard criteria for assessing symptom severity in chronic prostatitis recently have been developed and prospective clinical tria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many treatment protocols have been assessed previously, e.g., a-blocker therapy and antimicrobial therapy, but have failed to provide an acceptable outcome [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and the search for other drug regimens for such patients has gained favour among physicians [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many treatment protocols have been assessed previously, e.g., a-blocker therapy and antimicrobial therapy, but have failed to provide an acceptable outcome [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and the search for other drug regimens for such patients has gained favour among physicians [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of refractory CP/CPPS is frustrating and disappointing both for patients and physicians. Many treatment protocols have been assessed previously, e.g., α-blocker therapy and antimicrobial therapy, but have failed to provide an acceptable outcome [15–21] , and the search for other drug regimens for such patients has gained favour among physicians [22,23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%