2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.02929
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimax Kernel Machine Learning for a Class of Doubly Robust Functionals with Application to Proximal Causal Inference

Abstract: A moment function is called doubly robust if it is comprised of two nuisance functions and the estimator based on it is a consistent estimator of the target parameter even if one of the nuisance functions is misspecified. In this paper, we consider a class of doubly robust moment functions originally introduced in (Robins et al., 2008). We demonstrate that this moment function can be used to construct estimating equations for the nuisance functions. The main idea is to choose each nuisance function such that i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A complication in the proximal learning framework is that the nuisances are defined as the solutions to integral equations. Progress in this direction (in the context of reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces) is described in Ghassami et al (2021) and Kallus et al (2021). It would thus be useful to extend the work of Ghassami et al (2021) for nonparametric estimation of bridge functions in proximal mediation analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complication in the proximal learning framework is that the nuisances are defined as the solutions to integral equations. Progress in this direction (in the context of reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces) is described in Ghassami et al (2021) and Kallus et al (2021). It would thus be useful to extend the work of Ghassami et al (2021) for nonparametric estimation of bridge functions in proximal mediation analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will be able to extend previous studies that consider double negative control adjustment of unmeasured confounding in i.i.d. or panel data settings (Deaner, 2018;Shi et al, 2020;Cui et al, 2020;Tchetgen Tchetgen et al, 2020a;Ghassami et al, 2021) and methods that examine network effects without unmeasured network confounding (van der Laan, 2014; Ogburn et al, 2017;Forastiere et al, 2020;Ogburn et al, 2020;Tchetgen Tchetgen et al, 2020b). Another interesting open question is identification and estimation of causal peer effects in complex longitudinal studies with time-varying treatments (e.g., Robins et al, 2000;Tchetgen Tchetgen et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the additional complexity of the longitudinal setting, I recover equally strong results. In particular, [54,52,14,28,101,35,31,51,29,2] study static local parameters and [81,50,40,29] study static proximal parameters. Like the latter, I arrive at mean square rates and projected mean square rates of confounding bridges (also called nonparametric instrumental variable regressions).…”
Section: Localization and Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%