1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6377(99)00049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimax regret strategies for greenhouse gas abatement: methodology and application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Expected utility maximization is used as a decision criterion to be consistent with previous studies [27,39,41]. Other decision criteria (such as minimizing the consumption loss of the worst-case scenario analogous to Loulou and Kandia [30]) are possible and could be investigated with our model.…”
Section: Modifications To the Dice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expected utility maximization is used as a decision criterion to be consistent with previous studies [27,39,41]. Other decision criteria (such as minimizing the consumption loss of the worst-case scenario analogous to Loulou and Kandia [30]) are possible and could be investigated with our model.…”
Section: Modifications To the Dice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loulou and Kanudia [27,28] for example not only integrated sequential decision-making under uncertainty by means of stochastic programming into the bottom-up energy systems model MARKAL, but also implement a strategy that minimizes the maximal "regret" of a policy (minimax-regret strategy). Lange [29] combines expected utility and the maximin criterion for decision under uncertainty (maximize the minimal worst case outcome) in a two period model of optimal emissions.…”
Section: Further Issues and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is also the sunk cost effect and studies that consider both kinds of irreversibilities find that it is optimal to emit more in the short run if learning about uncertainties is possible [10,13,14,48]. Other studies find some evidence that it is optimal to chose an intermediate level of emission reductions, until uncertainty is resolved [27,28]. One policy recommendation that can be drawn is that in any case it makes sense to invest in flexible abatement measures that do not imply a large amount of sunk and irreversible investment.…”
Section: When To Reduce?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The MMR seeks to minimize the maximum regret among all possible states of the world. The regret value for a special state of the world (i.e., all scenario realizations) represents the difference between the cost of the alternative selected by decision-makers and that of the best alternative for that state of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this method has an advantage in providing effective decision support under uncertainty; it only needs a list of possible scenarios without any assumption on their probabilities. 39 In the MMR, uncertainties may be presented as random variables and, at the same time, some random events can only be quantified as intervals with lower and upper bounds, leading to dual uncertainties. This requires that both MMR and IMP techniques be incorporated within a general framework to reflect the uncertainties with varied quality levels and presentation formats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%