2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2012.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Weighted Mean Completion Time for Malleable Tasks Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beaumont et el. [15] analyzed a natural extension of the WRR algorithm [34] to identical parallel machines and prove the same competitive ratio of 2 for non-clairvoyant P|𝑝𝑚𝑡𝑛| 𝑤 𝑗 𝐶 𝑗 . Like WRR, their algorithm Weighted Dynamic EQuipartition (WDEQ) assigns processing rates to jobs proportional to their weights making sure that no job receives a higher rate than executable on one machine simultaneously.…”
Section: Identical Parallel Machinesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Beaumont et el. [15] analyzed a natural extension of the WRR algorithm [34] to identical parallel machines and prove the same competitive ratio of 2 for non-clairvoyant P|𝑝𝑚𝑡𝑛| 𝑤 𝑗 𝐶 𝑗 . Like WRR, their algorithm Weighted Dynamic EQuipartition (WDEQ) assigns processing rates to jobs proportional to their weights making sure that no job receives a higher rate than executable on one machine simultaneously.…”
Section: Identical Parallel Machinesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, [𝑟 𝑗 , 𝐶 𝑗 ] is not longer than [0, 𝐶 𝑗 ], giving 𝐶 𝑗 ≤ 𝑟 𝑗 + 𝐶 𝑗 . The facts that 𝑗 𝑤 𝑗 𝑟 𝑗 is a lower bound on the optimal objective value with release dates and 𝑗 𝑤 𝑗 𝐶 𝑗 is at most twice the optimal objective value without release dates [15] imply that WDEQ has a competitive ratio of at most 3 for 𝑃 |𝑟 𝑗 , 𝑝𝑚𝑡𝑛| 𝑤 𝑗 𝐶 𝐽 .…”
Section: Identical Parallel Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is for instance the case with the model studied by Prasanna and Musicus [21] where the processing time p i of task i is p i (k) = pi k α with α being a task-independent constant between 0 and 1 and k the number of allotted processors [21], [22]. Another instance is the simple single-threshold model, that is, the linear model [9], [10], [23], [24], [25]: p i (k) = pi k . Havill and Mao [26] added to that model an overhead affine in the number of processors used:…”
Section: Models Of Parallel Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%