2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40304-020-00221-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Density Power Divergence Estimator for Negative Binomial Integer-Valued GARCH Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When dealing with real-life data, extreme observations, not following the usual model, are commonly found. Other approaches to account for possible extreme observations include classical M-estimators or the recently published method by Li et al [22] or approaches based on the density power divergence, see for example Xiong and Zhu [23].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with real-life data, extreme observations, not following the usual model, are commonly found. Other approaches to account for possible extreme observations include classical M-estimators or the recently published method by Li et al [22] or approaches based on the density power divergence, see for example Xiong and Zhu [23].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two advantages to this approach: the first is simplicity, i.e., it contains only a single tuning parameter that controls the trade-off between robustness and efficiency; the second is the ability to balance robustness and efficiency, providing considerable robustness while retaining high levels of efficiency as the tuning parameter approaches zero. Further, Xiong and Zhu [ 62 ] and Xiong and Zhu [ 63 ] used the Mallows’ quasi-likelihood estimator and the minimum density power dispersion estimator as a robust estimator for negative binomial INGARCH models, respectively. For negative binomial INGARCH models, Elsaied and Fried [ 64 ] also developed several robust estimators including robustifications of method of moments and ML-estimation, one of which was an alternative to the robust estimator proposed by Xiong and Zhu [ 63 ].…”
Section: Count Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Xiong and Zhu [ 62 ] and Xiong and Zhu [ 63 ] used the Mallows’ quasi-likelihood estimator and the minimum density power dispersion estimator as a robust estimator for negative binomial INGARCH models, respectively. For negative binomial INGARCH models, Elsaied and Fried [ 64 ] also developed several robust estimators including robustifications of method of moments and ML-estimation, one of which was an alternative to the robust estimator proposed by Xiong and Zhu [ 63 ].…”
Section: Count Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%