2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11749-018-0610-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum distance model checking in Berkson measurement error models with validation data

Abstract: This article studies a minimum distance regression model checking approach in the presence of Berkson measurement errors in covariates without specifying the measurement error density but when external validation data are available. The proposed tests are based on a class of minimized integrated square distances between a nonparametric estimate of the calibrated regression function and the parametric null model being fitted. The asymptotic distributions of these tests under the null hypothesis and against cert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In economics, the household income is usually not precisely collected due to the survey design or data sensitivity. It was described by Kim et al (2016) (see also Geng and Koul (2018)) that when the income data were collected by asking individuals which salary range categories they belong to, then the midpoint of the range interval was used in analysis. In this case, it is wise to assume that the true income fluctuates around the midpoint observation subject to errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economics, the household income is usually not precisely collected due to the survey design or data sensitivity. It was described by Kim et al (2016) (see also Geng and Koul (2018)) that when the income data were collected by asking individuals which salary range categories they belong to, then the midpoint of the range interval was used in analysis. In this case, it is wise to assume that the true income fluctuates around the midpoint observation subject to errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%