2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-015-0850-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Induced Drag Theorems for Joined Wings, Closed Systems, and Generic Biwings: Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless no similar correlation was found for the torsional mode natural frequency for values of aspect ratio higher than 20, for which the first torsion and second chord-bending modes start to couple. Also from this study, the flutter mechanism was observed to change from a coupling between the first torsion mode with the second flapbending mode (for the lower aspect-ratio wings, [12][13][14][15][16] to a coupling between the first torsion mode with the third flap-bending mode (for higher aspect-ratio wings, 20-28) as the wing aspect ratio increases. Therefore, although significant changes in flutter speed occur due to high wing deformations, it is not possible to conclude how those changes affect the safety margin for flight operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless no similar correlation was found for the torsional mode natural frequency for values of aspect ratio higher than 20, for which the first torsion and second chord-bending modes start to couple. Also from this study, the flutter mechanism was observed to change from a coupling between the first torsion mode with the second flapbending mode (for the lower aspect-ratio wings, [12][13][14][15][16] to a coupling between the first torsion mode with the third flap-bending mode (for higher aspect-ratio wings, 20-28) as the wing aspect ratio increases. Therefore, although significant changes in flutter speed occur due to high wing deformations, it is not possible to conclude how those changes affect the safety margin for flight operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Different approaches can be applied to increase wing Aspect Ratio (AR) for conventional designs such as increasing wingspan or reducing wing chord. Also unconventional aircraft designs such as the Joined-Wing (11,39) , the Strut-Braced-Wing (10,11) , the Box-Wing (11,19) and the C-Wing (14,15,26) also have the goal of reducing the induced drag by means of increasing the wing aspect ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-wings have been considered a compromise between a box wing and a winglet; theoretically providing a reduction in the induced drag that approaches that of the closed box wing 14,[29][30][31] arrangement whilst additionally reducing the viscous drag penalty incurred by large wetted areas 32,33 . The C-wing and box wing have also been recognised to have the potential to replace the conventional horizontal stabiliser to provide pitch control 18,34 .…”
Section: Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a nonplanar and closed wing system, the box wing experiences less induced drag compared to a planar wing of the same span and lift. This comes as a result of the distribution of circulation over a greater mass of air, leading to a reduction in average kinetic energy added to the flow [27], and as a result of more gradual circulation gradients, especially near the wing tips [56].…”
Section: The Box Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an advantage comes from being a closed wing system, which allows a constant vortex loop to be added to the circulation with minimal penalty to induced drag [27]. Indeed, this property was corroborated by Demasi et al [56], who found the optimum partitioning of total lift between the fore and aft wings, originally assumed to be equal by…”
Section: The Box Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%