1997
DOI: 10.1109/mper.1997.560711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Loss Reconfiguration of Unbalanced Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Currents of branches 15,16,17,18,19,20, and 21 of the target optimum configuration are higher than in initial configuration. That shows that the conclusion of Padilha Feltrin 28 is only partly true.…”
Section: Voltage and Current Constraint (Tables 3 And 4)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Currents of branches 15,16,17,18,19,20, and 21 of the target optimum configuration are higher than in initial configuration. That shows that the conclusion of Padilha Feltrin 28 is only partly true.…”
Section: Voltage and Current Constraint (Tables 3 And 4)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…O método foi aplicado em um sistema de distribuição real de 20 kV na Grécia. Dois anos depois, Borozan (1997) com base em seus próprios trabalhos de 1995, publicou um método heurístico para reconfigurar sistemas de distribuição trifásicos desbalanceados, visando à diminuição de perdas por efeito Joule, considerando o desequilíbrio entre as cargas. O método foi testado em um sistema de distribuição realístico e nos resultados foi dada ênfase à análise da influência que o desequilíbrio das cargas provoca no resultado da reconfiguração.…”
Section: Pesquisas Correlatas Em Reconfiguraçãounclassified
“…We have not chosen a three-phase line and load representation because the analysis performed previously at the distribution system under consideration [9] shows that the present system imbalances are not great enough to significantly affect the system operator's decisions.…”
Section: Feeder Parameter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%