1982
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.1982.1051810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum propagation delays in VLSI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods can be used. The simplest method is the Sutherland method [4], directly deduced from the Mead's optimization rule of an ideal inverter array [15]: the same delay constraint is imposed on each element of the path. If this supplies a very fast method for distributing the constraint, this is at the cost of an over sizing of the gates with an important logical weight value…”
Section: Constraint Distribution: Constant Sensitivity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods can be used. The simplest method is the Sutherland method [4], directly deduced from the Mead's optimization rule of an ideal inverter array [15]: the same delay constraint is imposed on each element of the path. If this supplies a very fast method for distributing the constraint, this is at the cost of an over sizing of the gates with an important logical weight value…”
Section: Constraint Distribution: Constant Sensitivity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the lower bound has been the subject of numerous proposals. For ideal inverters without parasitic loading the minimum is reached when all the inverters have an equal tapering factor that can be easily calculated from a first order delay representation [7,15]. Applying the explicit representation given in (1) to a bounded combinatorial path, the inferior delay bound is easily obtained by canceling the de-rivative of the path delay with respect to the input capacitance of the gates.…”
Section: Constraint Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the propagation delay for the various designs, we adopt a simple and well-known model [10]. We assume the use of square areas for the layout of cells and the entire array, making the longest wire length proportional to k .…”
Section: Design Trade-offs and Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with c 1 , c 2 , and c 3 being technology-dependent constants [10]. We have derived these constants for the following analysis using a 0.8 µm CMOS double-metal technology with the second layer of metal for interconnections.…”
Section: Design Trade-offs and Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the improvements of this technology, circuits could be made smaller and smaller. It turned out, however, that if all characteristic dimensions of a circuit are scaled down by a certain factor, including the clock period, delays in long wires do not scale down proportional to the clock period [14,22]. As a consequence, some VLSI designs when scaled down may no longer work properly anymore, because delays for some computations have become larger than the clock period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%