“…It was probably due to the higher CA soil moisture [19,53,54] than in the TA, 10.89 ± 0.72 and 9.93 ± 0.51%, respectively (Figure 4), and cover crop in the CA presented 0.24 ± 0.06 kg m −2 of Desmodium sp., which served as a food source for earthworms [19]. Analogously, the number of earthworms m −2 reported by McInga et al, Nurul Aini et al, and Birkás et al [18,53,55] in the CA soils was higher by 24, 17, and 52 earthworms m −2 , respectively, than in the TA soils, probably due to the elimination of tillage and the presence of crop stubble on the soil, conditions that provided a suitable abiotic environment for the development of earthworms [54]. The earthworm population with hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and bulk density (Bd) showed a negative and positive correlation (r = −0.93 and r = 0.43), respectively, probably due to a certain population of "soil compacting earthworm species" such as Millsonia anomala Omodeo and Vaillaud, normally found in the Peruvian Amazon [51], which could increase Bd and decrease Ks.…”